Nikita S/o Kishan, Age 19 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Bhikkunayak Tanda, Yatebarpur, Tq Chincholi. vs Manik S/o Late. Meghu, Age 45 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Bhikkunayak Tanda, Yatebarpur, Tq Chincholi. — 62/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Status: Notice. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Notice Next hearing 27-Apr-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB410002102025

Filing Number

63/2025

Filing Date

27-Jun-2025

Registration No

62/2025

Registration Date

27-Jun-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI

Judge

828-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

Last updated 13-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nikita S/o Kishan, Age 19 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Bhikkunayak Tanda, Yatebarpur, Tq Chincholi.

    Adv. NEELKANTH H RATHOD

  2. 2.Vinod S/o Kishan, Age 17 yrs, Occ Student, Minor U/g of their mother, R/o Bhikkunayak Tanda, Yatebarpur, Tq Chincholi

  3. 3.Rohith S/o Kishan, Age 14 yrs, Occ Student, Minor U/g of their mother, R/o Bhikkunayak Tanda, Yatebarpur, Tq Chincholi.

  4. 4.Yashodha W/o Kishan, Age 35 yrs, Occ Household, R/o Bhikkunayak Tanda, Yatebarpur, Tq Chincholi.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manik S/o Late. Meghu, Age 45 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Bhikkunayak Tanda, Yatebarpur, Tq Chincholi.

  2. 2.Babu S/o Late. Meghu, Age 43 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Bhikkunayak Tanda, Yatebarpur, Tq Chincholi.

  3. 3.Chatru S/o Late. Meghu, Age 41 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Bhikkunayak Tanda, Yatebarpur, Tq Chincholi.

  4. 4.Ghemu S/o Late. Meghu, Age 39 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Bhikkunayak Tanda, Yatebarpur, Tq Chincholi.

  5. 5.Kishan S/o Late. Meghu, Age 37 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Bhikkunayak Tanda, Yatebarpur, Tq Chincholi.

  6. 6.Shamu S/o Late. Meghu, Age 35 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Bhikkunayak Tanda, Yatebarpur, Tq Chincholi.

  7. 7.Veerasanga S/o Shankar, Age 50 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Bhikkunayak Tanda, Yatebarpur, Tq Chincholi.

  8. 8.Rekhu S/o Shankar, Age 48 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Bhikkunayak Tanda, Yatebarpur, Tq Chincholi.

  9. 9.Bheemu S/o Shankar, Age 46 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Bhikkunayak Tanda, Yatebarpur, Tq Chincholi.

  10. 10.Hirasingh S/o Shankar, Age 44 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Bhikkunayak Tanda, Yatebarpur, Tq Chincholi.

  11. 11.Rathod Kavitha W/o Ghemu, Age 35 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Bhikkunayak Tanda, Yatebarpur, Tq Chincholi.

  12. 12.Rathod Kavitha W/o Prakash, Age 32 yrs, Occ Agri, R/o Soorunayak Tanda, Tq Chincholi.

Case History

  1. 27-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  3. 06-Feb-2026

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  4. 20-Jan-2026

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  5. 03-Nov-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  6. 02-Sep-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  7. 31-Jul-2025

    A.D.R.

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi

  8. 28-Jun-2025

    OrdersView PDF

    Temporary Injunction Granted. The court granted an ex-parte temporary injunction restraining defendants from alienating ancestral joint family properties until the next hearing on 07.08.2025, finding that plaintiffs (children of defendants) established a prima facie case for partition and separate possession. Plaintiffs must comply with CPC Order 39 Rule 3 and pay any deficit process fee within three days, or the order stands vacated automatically. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 28-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 27-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 62/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Temporary Injunction Granted. The court granted an ex-parte temporary injunction restraining defendants from alienating ancestral joint family properties until the next hearing on 07.08.2025, finding that plaintiffs (children of defendants) established a prima facie case for partition and separate possession. Plaintiffs must comply with CPC Order 39 Rule 3 and pay any deficit process fee within three days, or the order stands vacated automatically. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case