Shankerappa S/o Gireppa Mudda, Age 88 yrs, Occ NIl, Senior Citizen through his SPA vs Shivaraj S/o Sidramappa Chipti, Age 62 yrs, Occ Retired ASI and Agri, R/o Degalmadi, Tq Chincholi. — 5/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43. Status: ORDERS.. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.

M.A. - Miscellanuous Appeals

CNR: KAKB410002002025

ORDERS.

Next Hearing

16th March 2026

Filing Number

5/2025

Filing Date

19-06-2025

Registration No

5/2025

Registration Date

19-06-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI

Judge

828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 43

Petitioner(s)

Shankerappa S/o Gireppa Mudda, Age 88 yrs, Occ NIl, Senior Citizen through his SPA

Adv. JAGANATH P AGNIHOTRI

Respondent(s)

Shivaraj S/o Sidramappa Chipti, Age 62 yrs, Occ Retired ASI (Assistant Sub-Inspector) and Agri, R/o Degalmadi, Tq Chincholi.

Hearing History

Judge: 828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi

13-03-2026

ORDERS.

12-03-2026

ORDERS.

11-03-2026

ORDERS.

10-03-2026

ORDERS.

09-03-2026

ORDERS.

Interim Orders

24-06-2025
Orders

Summary: An ex-parte temporary injunction was granted restraining the defendant from constructing on the plaintiff's property pending suit disposal. The court found the plaintiff has established a prima facie case of ownership based on tax records and Gram Panchayat endorsements showing the property has been registered in the plaintiff's name since 2004, while the defendant lacks supporting documents. The plaintiff must comply with CPC Order 39 Rule 3 and pay any deficit court fees within three days, failing which the order stands vacated automatically; the matter is returnable by 01.08.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: An ex-parte temporary injunction was granted restraining the defendant from constructing on the plaintiff's property pending suit disposal. The court found the plaintiff has established a prima facie case of ownership based on tax records and Gram Panchayat endorsements showing the property has been registered in the plaintiff's name since 2004, while the defendant lacks supporting documents. The plaintiff must comply with CPC Order 39 Rule 3 and pay any deficit court fees within three days, failing which the order stands vacated automatically; the matter is returnable by 01.08.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case