Nagreddy S/o Shivareddy deceased LRs.(Legal Heir) vs Premila W/o Ramanna 48 yrs Occ Household R/o Hasargundagi now at H.No.70 behind of Ashram Devangund — 14/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED BY ADR on 21st April 2026.
R.A. - Regular Appeals
CNR: KAKB410001302023
Filing Number
14/2023
Filing Date
06-04-2023
Registration No
14/2023
Registration Date
06-04-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI
Judge
828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED BY ADR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nagreddy S/o Shivareddy deceased LRs.(Legal Heir)
Adv. B.SUDARSHAN1.
Sanjeevreddy S/o Nagreddy 26 yrs Occ Agri R/o Hasargundi Tq Chincholi 1.
Shailaja D/o Nagareddy 24 yrs Occ Household R/o Hasargundi Tq Chincholi
Chandamma W/o Nagreddy 48 yrs Occ Household R/o Hasargundagi Tq Chincholi Dist Kalaburagi
Sahebreddy S/o Nagreddy R/o Hasargundagi Tq Chincholi Dist Kalaburagi
Respondent(s)
Premila W/o Ramanna 48 yrs Occ Household R/o Hasargundagi now at H.No.70 behind of Ashram Devangund
Sangareddy S/o Gundareddy 25 yrs Occ Agri R/o Kalbenoor, Tq Chincholi
Bharathi W/o Jagannathreddy Occ Agri R/o Chincholi
Krishnareddy S/o Vithal 26 yrs Occ Agri R/o Hasargundi Tq Chincholi
Narsamma W/o Vithalreddy 52 yrs Occ Agri R/o Hasargundi Tq Chincholi
Jagadevi W/o Late Jagganath 52 yrs Occ Agri R/o Hasargundi Tq Chincholi
Vithal reddy s/o. Shivareddy, age62yrs, occ agri, r/o Hasaragundagi, tq chincholi, now residing at Rajapur village, tq kalagi, dist kalaburgi
Hearing History
Judge: 828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
Disposed
HEARING.
A.D.R.
HEARING.
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-03-2026 | HEARING. |
| 13-03-2026 | A.D.R. |
| 28-02-2026 | HEARING. |
| 26-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court accepted a compromise petition filed by all parties under Section 23, Rule 3 of CPC and allowed the appeal filed against the 2013 judgment in OS 46/2011. The court found the compromise terms acceptable with no legal impediments or violations of natural justice and public policy, and verified the parties' signatures and identity documents. A compromise decree was ordered to be drawn accordingly with parties required to furnish non-judicial stamp. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court accepted a compromise petition filed by all parties under Section 23, Rule 3 of CPC and allowed the appeal filed against the 2013 judgment in OS 46/2011. The court found the compromise terms acceptable with no legal impediments or violations of natural justice and public policy, and verified the parties' signatures and identity documents. A compromise decree was ordered to be drawn accordingly with parties required to furnish non-judicial stamp. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts