Tholla Pushpalatha W/o Late Tholla Ravinder, Age. 40 Years, Occ. Household. vs M/s Govardhan Reddy Ranjole S/o R.Govardhan Reddy. Age.Major, Occ. Owner of Bulero — 382/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAKB410001062025

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

Filing Number

355/2025

Filing Date

19-02-2025

Registration No

382/2025

Registration Date

04-03-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI

Judge

828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Tholla Pushpalatha W/o Late Tholla Ravinder, Age. 40 Years, Occ. Household.

Adv. B.V.PATIL

T Manish S/o Late. Tholla Ravinder, Age. 17 years, Occ. Student.

Tholla Bhavana D/o Late. Tholla Ravinder Age.16 Years. Occ. Ni.

Tolla Sathyamma W/o Late. Tolla buchhaiah Age.70 Years, Occ. Nil.

Respondent(s)

M/s Govardhan Reddy Ranjole S/o R.Govardhan Reddy. Age.Major, Occ. Owner of Bulero

The Zuno General Insurance Ltd. Through The General Manager, Zuno General Insurance Ltd.

Hearing History

Judge: 828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

13-02-2026

EVIDENCE

09-01-2026

EVIDENCE

11-12-2025

EVIDENCE

10-12-2025

APPEARANCE OF PARTY

Interim Orders

11-12-2025
Issue
13-02-2026
Deposition

Summary SKIP Reason: While the document is in Kannada (an Indian language) and partially readable, it consists primarily of procedural evidence documentation and witness examination details from a motor vehicle accident case (MVC No. 382/2025). The document does not contain a clear final court order with a specific outcome (such as bail granted/denied, petition allowed/dismissed, or case adjournment). Instead, it details evidence marked during proceedings and raises contentious points from opposing counsel, without concluding with an adjudication or order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary SKIP Reason: While the document is in Kannada (an Indian language) and partially readable, it consists primarily of procedural evidence documentation and witness examination details from a motor vehicle accident case (MVC No. 382/2025). The document does not contain a clear final court order with a specific outcome (such as bail granted/denied, petition allowed/dismissed, or case adjournment). Instead, it details evidence marked during proceedings and raises contentious points from opposing counsel, without concluding with an adjudication or order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case