RAGHUNATH S/O LAXMAN, 36 Years Occ.Business R/o Tumakunta Tq.Chincholi Dist.Kalaburgi vs SEENU S/O NARASIMULU R/o Antwaram Venkatapur Tq.Chincholi Dist.Kalaburgi — 10/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 166MVCact. Status: ARGUMENTS-CIVIL. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAKB410000262023
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
1233/2023
Filing Date
02-11-2022
Registration No
10/2023
Registration Date
05-01-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI
Judge
828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAGHUNATH S/O LAXMAN, 36 Years Occ.Business R/o Tumakunta Tq.Chincholi Dist.Kalaburgi
Respondent(s)
SEENU S/O NARASIMULU R/o Antwaram Venkatapur Tq.Chincholi Dist.Kalaburgi
TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD 5th Floor Mavurkar building Near SB Patil Petrol Court Rd, Kalabur
Hearing History
Judge: 828-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,Chincholi
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
EVIDENCE
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 27-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 20-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 07-01-2026 | SUMMONS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: M.V.C. 10/2023 Date: 20-02-2026 Outcome: The court rejected the petitioner's (SSA) claims in this motor vehicle insurance dispute. The court found that the petitioner submitted false evidence and made false statements, including claims that the vehicle lacked proper insurance authorization. The court upheld the police final report and ruled against the petitioner's arguments, determining that Section 181 MV Act charges were appropriately filed and the insurance claim was properly denied based on fraudulent documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: M.V.C. 10/2023 Date: 20-02-2026 Outcome: The court rejected the petitioner's (SSA) claims in this motor vehicle insurance dispute. The court found that the petitioner submitted false evidence and made false statements, including claims that the vehicle lacked proper insurance authorization. The court upheld the police final report and ruled against the petitioner's arguments, determining that Section 181 MV Act charges were appropriately filed and the insurance claim was properly denied based on fraudulent documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts