Hanamanth S/o Ningappa Allapur Age 52 yrs Occ Agri R/o Mannur, Tq Afzalpur, Dist Kalaburagi vs Sarubai W/o Gajanan Dhindure @ Allapur Age 49 yrs Occ Household, R/o Mannur, Tq Afzalpur — 77/2021

Case under U/o Vii Rule 1 and 2 Cpc Section CPC. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 13th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB320031622021

Case disposed

Filing Number

78/2021

Filing Date

17-08-2021

Registration No

77/2021

Registration Date

17-08-2021

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR

Judge

323-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

Acts & Sections

U/o Vii Rule 1 and 2 Cpc Section CPC

Petitioner(s)

Hanamanth S/o Ningappa Allapur Age 52 yrs Occ Agri R/o Mannur, Tq Afzalpur, Dist Kalaburagi

Adv. Sri. C.S.Hiremath Adv

Respondent(s)

Sarubai W/o Gajanan Dhindure @ Allapur Age 49 yrs Occ Household, R/o Mannur, Tq Afzalpur

Hearing History

Judge: 323-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR

13-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

JUDGMENTS

07-03-2026

ARGUMENTS.

06-03-2026

ARGUMENTS.

03-03-2026

ARGUMENTS.

Interim Orders

24-10-2024
Deposition
26-11-2024
Deposition
04-04-2025
Deposition
22-04-2025
Deposition
09-06-2025
Deposition
26-05-2022
Issue
20-08-2025
Deposition
11-12-2025
Deposition

The court (OS 77/2021) dismissed the defendant's (DW-1) claims regarding property ownership and inheritance rights. The judgment held that the defendant failed to establish legal ownership over the disputed property under Section 8-43 of the relevant act, and that the plaintiff's rights to the property were superior. The court's decision was based on the evidence presented and the applicable legal provisions governing property succession and ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court (OS 77/2021) dismissed the defendant's (DW-1) claims regarding property ownership and inheritance rights. The judgment held that the defendant failed to establish legal ownership over the disputed property under Section 8-43 of the relevant act, and that the plaintiff's rights to the property were superior. The court's decision was based on the evidence presented and the applicable legal provisions governing property succession and ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case