Chandappagouda Son of Hanamantraya Gouda Patil Age 60 Yrs Occ Agri vs The Panchayat Development Officer Gram Panchyat — 72/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,vii,rule,1,r/w,sec,26,of,cpc. Status: Orders.. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.

Orders. Next hearing 18-Mar-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB320029232025

e-Filing Number

05-11-2025

Filing Number

75/2025

Filing Date

10-Nov-2025

Registration No

72/2025

Registration Date

12-Nov-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR

Judge

323-CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Afzalpur

Last updated 14-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,vii,rule,1,r/w,sec,26,of,cpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chandappagouda Son of Hanamantraya Gouda Patil Age 60 Yrs Occ Agri

    Adv. Rajendra D Sardar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Panchayat Development Officer Gram Panchyat

  2. 2.The Deputy Director Of Public Instructions

  3. 3.The Block Education Officer

  4. 4.The Head Master Government High School

Case History

  1. 18-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Orders.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Afzalpur

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Afzalpur

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Afzalpur

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Afzalpur

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Afzalpur

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Afzalpur

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Afzalpur

  9. 20-Jan-2026

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Afzalpur

  10. 05-Jan-2026

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Afzalpur

  11. 15-Dec-2025

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Afzalpur

  12. 12-Nov-2025

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary: The court denied the plaintiff's application for ad-interim injunction (I.A. No. II) restraining defendants from interfering with suit property in Ghattarga village. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima-facie case and that granting the injunction would be unsafe given the defendants are public servants constructing a public school. An emergent notice and suit summons have been issued to defendants, with the case adjourned to 15-12-2025 for their appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 12-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 10-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 72/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court denied the plaintiff's application for ad-interim injunction (I.A. No. II) restraining defendants from interfering with suit property in Ghattarga village. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima-facie case and that granting the injunction would be unsafe given the defendants are public servants constructing a public school. An emergent notice and suit summons have been issued to defendants, with the case adjourned to 15-12-2025 for their appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case