Afzalpur PS vs Laxman S/o. Dasharat Salagar age 22 yrs occ coolie R/o Gour B — 386/2019
Case under Ipc Act Section IPC. Status: EVIDENCE.. Next hearing: 18th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB320006752019
Next Hearing
18th April 2026
Filing Number
386/2019
Filing Date
17-10-2019
Registration No
386/2019
Registration Date
17-10-2019
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR
Judge
323-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Afzalpur PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Laxman S/o. Dasharat Salagar age 22 yrs occ coolie R/o Gour B
Hearing History
Judge: 323-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR
EVIDENCE.
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE. |
| 31-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 18-12-2025 | EVIDENCE. |
| 30-10-2025 | EVIDENCE. |
| 09-09-2025 | EVIDENCE. |
Interim Orders
Summary: In FIR No. 386/2019 before the First Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Afzalpur, the court examined charges under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and Sections 3(a) and 4(a) of the same Act. The court found that the accusations lack substantiation and ordered the dismissal of the petition. The case involved allegations of animal cruelty based on a raid conducted on 31-10-2018 where gold ornaments (20.3 grams), silver items (4.7 grams), and cash (Rs. 1,26,000) were recovered, but the evidence proved insufficient to sustain the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In FIR No. 386/2019 before the First Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Afzalpur, the court examined charges under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and Sections 3(a) and 4(a) of the same Act. The court found that the accusations lack substantiation and ordered the dismissal of the petition. The case involved allegations of animal cruelty based on a raid conducted on 31-10-2018 where gold ornaments (20.3 grams), silver items (4.7 grams), and cash (Rs. 1,26,000) were recovered, but the evidence proved insufficient to sustain the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts