Afzalpur PS vs Ganapati S/o Basanna Kanthagol Age 62 yrs Occ Coolie R/o Mallabad Tq Afzalpur — 389/2020

Case under Kp Act Section U/Sec.78(3)ofKPAct. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAKB320006012020

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

389/2020

Filing Date

17-11-2020

Registration No

389/2020

Registration Date

17-11-2020

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR

Judge

323-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

149

Police Station

AFZALPUR PS

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

KP ACT Section U/Sec.78(3)ofKPAct

Petitioner(s)

Afzalpur PS (Police Station)

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Ganapati S/o Basanna Kanthagol Age 62 yrs Occ Coolie R/o Mallabad Tq Afzalpur

Hearing History

Judge: 323-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR

07-03-2026

Disposed

23-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

05-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

20-01-2026

ARGUMENTS

29-12-2025

ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Judgment

Summary The court acquitted the accused (Gunapathi) of charges under the Karnataka Police Act, Section 78(3) for running an illegal lottery scheme. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the investigation lacked proper procedural compliance, the seized evidence was not adequately documented, and the prosecution witnesses were government officials with potential bias rather than independent witnesses to the alleged crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

08-04-2025
Deposition
28-10-2025
Deposition
29-12-2025
Deposition
20-01-2026
313 Statement
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused (Gunapathi) of charges under the Karnataka Police Act, Section 78(3) for running an illegal lottery scheme. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the investigation lacked proper procedural compliance, the seized evidence was not adequately documented, and the prosecution witnesses were government officials with potential bias rather than independent witnesses to the alleged crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case