Shantakumar S/o Sidramappa Goushetty age 46 years occ agriculture Ro Mashal village vs Shankreppa So Sidramappa Goushetty age 22 years occ 22 yrs occ agriculture Ro Mashal village — 20/2016
Case under U/o Vii Rule 1 and 2 Cpc Section UnderorderVIIrule1R/wsec26ofCPC. Status: EVIDENCE... Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB320002432016
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
20/2016
Filing Date
22-03-2016
Registration No
20/2016
Registration Date
23-03-2016
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR
Judge
323-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shantakumar S/o Sidramappa Goushetty age 46 years occ agriculture Ro Mashal village
Adv. Sri. K.P.Biradar Adv
Respondent(s)
Shankreppa So Sidramappa Goushetty age 22 years occ 22 yrs occ agriculture Ro Mashal village
Satish Rathod village Accountant Mashal village Tq Afzalpur
Hearing History
Judge: 323-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR
EVIDENCE..
EVIDENCE..
EVIDENCE..
EVIDENCE..
EVIDENCE..
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-06-2026 | EVIDENCE.. |
| 02-05-2026 | EVIDENCE.. |
| 30-04-2026 | EVIDENCE.. |
| 27-04-2026 | EVIDENCE.. |
| 15-04-2026 | EVIDENCE.. |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 20/2016 Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court found that Section 402 IPC was not applicable to the case and that the conditions required under Section 20 of the relevant act were not satisfied. The court determined there was insufficient evidence to support the petitioner's claims and ruled against the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 20/2016 Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court found that Section 402 IPC was not applicable to the case and that the conditions required under Section 20 of the relevant act were not satisfied. The court determined there was insufficient evidence to support the petitioner's claims and ruled against the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts