Afzalpur ps vs Siddu @ Siddarama So Mailappa Patil 24 yrs occ business Ro Afzalpur — 7/2015
Case under Ipc Act Section 147148341353324333504rw149IPC. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 28th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB320000452015
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
7/2015
Filing Date
12-01-2015
Registration No
7/2015
Registration Date
12-01-2015
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR
Judge
323-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR
Decision Date
28th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Afzalpur ps (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Siddu @ Siddarama So Mailappa Patil 24 yrs occ business Ro Afzalpur
Yallappa So Saibanna Pujari age 45 yrs occ agru Ro Mannur
Ramling So Sharanappa Vaddar age 36 yrs occ collie Ro Revoor B
Hearing History
Judge: 323-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 16-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 12-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the 26th accused of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 504, 324, 332, 353, 341, 148, and 143 (with section 149), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while witnesses testified about a disturbance during village elections on May 17, 2010, they could not identify the accused with certainty or establish his specific involvement in the alleged assault and obstruction of election duties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court acquitted the 26th accused of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 504, 324, 332, 353, 341, 148, and 143 (with section 149), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that while witnesses testified about a disturbance during village elections on May 17, 2010, they could not identify the accused with certainty or establish his specific involvement in the alleged assault and obstruction of election duties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts