BHAGAMMA W/O YARAGALLAPPA TALAVAR D/O PEERAPPA GUDED AGE-55YRS. OCCU-AGRI R/O KULKUMATAGI TQ.SINDGI vs SRISHAIL S/O PEERAPPA GUDED AGE-42YRS. OCCU-AGRI R/O KARAJAGI TQ.AFZALPUR — 157/2024
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section CIVIL. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB310003882024
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
22-10-2024
Filing Number
160/2024
Filing Date
28-10-2024
Registration No
157/2024
Registration Date
28-10-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR
Judge
974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHAGAMMA W/O YARAGALLAPPA TALAVAR D/O PEERAPPA GUDED AGE-55YRS. OCCU-AGRI R/O KULKUMATAGI TQ.SINDGI
Adv. Doulat. k advocate
Respondent(s)
SRISHAIL S/O PEERAPPA GUDED AGE-42YRS. OCCU-AGRI R/O KARAJAGI TQ.AFZALPUR
DEVAKKI W/O SRIMANT D/O PEERAPPA GUDED AGE-45YRS. OCCU-AGRI R/O KARAJAGI TQ.AFZALPUR
AVAMMA W/O SHARANAPPA CHETTARAKI D/O PEERAPPA GUDED AGE-38YRS. OCCU-AGRI R/O KARAJAGI TQ.AFZALPUR
Hearing History
Judge: 974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
ORDERS-
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 10-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 28-01-2026 | ORDERS- |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed IA No-4 filed by the plaintiff under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC for amendment of the plaint in a partition and separate possession suit. The plaintiff sought to insert the boundaries of the agricultural land (Survey No-56/2, measuring 4 acre 8 gunta) which were omitted due to oversight. The court held that the amendment would not prejudice the defendants and would allow the plaintiff to present his case on merits, hence the application was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed IA No-4 filed by the plaintiff under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC for amendment of the plaint in a partition and separate possession suit. The plaintiff sought to insert the boundaries of the agricultural land (Survey No-56/2, measuring 4 acre 8 gunta) which were omitted due to oversight. The court held that the amendment would not prejudice the defendants and would allow the plaintiff to present his case on merits, hence the application was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts