Rajkumar S/o Ramachandr Chopade Age-28Yrs. Occu-Agri R/o Loni (KD) Tq.Indi vs Andubai W/o Bheemashankar Koli Age-45Yrs. Occu-HH. R/o Sesgire Tq. Afzalpur — 139/2024

Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section 26. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB310002982024

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

e-Filing Number

12-09-2024

Filing Number

142/2024

Filing Date

13-09-2024

Registration No

139/2024

Registration Date

13-09-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR

Judge

974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.

Acts & Sections

U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section 26

Petitioner(s)

Rajkumar S/o Ramachandr Chopade Age-28Yrs. Occu-Agri R/o Loni (KD) Tq.Indi

Adv. Arjun S Keroor

Sunanda W/o Ramachandr Age-50Yrs. Occu-HH. R/o Loni (KD) Tq.Indi

Adv. Arjun S Keroor

Respondent(s)

Andubai W/o Bheemashankar Koli Age-45Yrs. Occu-HH. R/o Sesgire Tq. Afzalpur

Sachin S/o Dundappa Pandre Age-19Yrs. Occu-Agri R/o SulerJewalgi Tq.Southsolapur

Mahesh S/o Ningappa Hosamani Age-50Yrs. Occu-Agri R/o Agarkhed Tq.Indi

Dhasarath S/o Basanna Bandagar Age-45 Yrs. Occu-Agri R/o Sesagir Tq.Afzalpur

Hearing History

Judge: 974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.

27-04-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

10-04-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

25-03-2026

ORDERS-

17-03-2026

TO HEAR

13-03-2026

TO HEAR

Interim Orders

13-09-2024
Orders
11-08-2025
Orders
11-08-2025
Issue
09-12-2025
Deposition
10-04-2026
Orders

Case Summary: OS No. 139/2024 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application (I.A. No-4) for appointment of a court commissioner to survey disputed properties. Key Facts: Plaintiffs Rajkumar and Sunanda filed a suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction against three defendants, alleging unauthorized encroachment on their land. The plaintiffs sought appointment of a surveyor to verify possession and verify a pathway. Defendants objected, arguing the application was dilatory and unnecessary. Court's Decision: The Senior Civil Judge found insufficient grounds for appointing a court commissioner at that stage of proceedings, noting the materials on record did not demonstrate necessity for such appointment. The application was dismissed, and the case proceeded for further examination of Plaintiff Witness-1. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS No. 139/2024 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application (I.A. No-4) for appointment of a court commissioner to survey disputed properties. Key Facts: Plaintiffs Rajkumar and Sunanda filed a suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction against three defendants, alleging unauthorized encroachment on their land. The plaintiffs sought appointment of a surveyor to verify possession and verify a pathway. Defendants objected, arguing the application was dilatory and unnecessary. Court's Decision: The Senior Civil Judge found insufficient grounds for appointing a court commissioner at that stage of proceedings, noting the materials on record did not demonstrate necessity for such appointment. The application was dismissed, and the case proceeded for further examination of Plaintiff Witness-1. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case