Rajkumar S/o Ramachandr Chopade Age-28Yrs. Occu-Agri R/o Loni (KD) Tq.Indi vs Andubai W/o Bheemashankar Koli Age-45Yrs. Occu-HH. R/o Sesgire Tq. Afzalpur — 139/2024
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section 26. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB310002982024
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
12-09-2024
Filing Number
142/2024
Filing Date
13-09-2024
Registration No
139/2024
Registration Date
13-09-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR
Judge
974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajkumar S/o Ramachandr Chopade Age-28Yrs. Occu-Agri R/o Loni (KD) Tq.Indi
Adv. Arjun S Keroor
Sunanda W/o Ramachandr Age-50Yrs. Occu-HH. R/o Loni (KD) Tq.Indi
Adv. Arjun S Keroor
Respondent(s)
Andubai W/o Bheemashankar Koli Age-45Yrs. Occu-HH. R/o Sesgire Tq. Afzalpur
Sachin S/o Dundappa Pandre Age-19Yrs. Occu-Agri R/o SulerJewalgi Tq.Southsolapur
Mahesh S/o Ningappa Hosamani Age-50Yrs. Occu-Agri R/o Agarkhed Tq.Indi
Dhasarath S/o Basanna Bandagar Age-45 Yrs. Occu-Agri R/o Sesagir Tq.Afzalpur
Hearing History
Judge: 974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
ORDERS-
TO HEAR
TO HEAR
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 10-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 25-03-2026 | ORDERS- |
| 17-03-2026 | TO HEAR |
| 13-03-2026 | TO HEAR |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS No. 139/2024 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application (I.A. No-4) for appointment of a court commissioner to survey disputed properties. Key Facts: Plaintiffs Rajkumar and Sunanda filed a suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction against three defendants, alleging unauthorized encroachment on their land. The plaintiffs sought appointment of a surveyor to verify possession and verify a pathway. Defendants objected, arguing the application was dilatory and unnecessary. Court's Decision: The Senior Civil Judge found insufficient grounds for appointing a court commissioner at that stage of proceedings, noting the materials on record did not demonstrate necessity for such appointment. The application was dismissed, and the case proceeded for further examination of Plaintiff Witness-1. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS No. 139/2024 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application (I.A. No-4) for appointment of a court commissioner to survey disputed properties. Key Facts: Plaintiffs Rajkumar and Sunanda filed a suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction against three defendants, alleging unauthorized encroachment on their land. The plaintiffs sought appointment of a surveyor to verify possession and verify a pathway. Defendants objected, arguing the application was dilatory and unnecessary. Court's Decision: The Senior Civil Judge found insufficient grounds for appointing a court commissioner at that stage of proceedings, noting the materials on record did not demonstrate necessity for such appointment. The application was dismissed, and the case proceeded for further examination of Plaintiff Witness-1. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts