HALAPPA S/O PEERAPPA SAPPANGOL vs PEERAPPA S/O AMBANNA SAPPANGOL — 93/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section VII,1,26. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB310002202025
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
05-07-2025
Filing Number
93/2025
Filing Date
09-07-2025
Registration No
93/2025
Registration Date
09-07-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR
Judge
974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HALAPPA S/O PEERAPPA SAPPANGOL
Adv. ISHWAR PKAMALAPURKAR
Respondent(s)
PEERAPPA S/O AMBANNA SAPPANGOL
BHAGYASHREE W/O MAHADEVAPPA HANAMANTGOL
SHARANAMMA W/O SUDHAKAR
RESHMA W/O SIDDU
DEVENDRAPPA S/O PEERAPPA DIED BY LRs(Legal Heir)
Hearing History
Judge: 974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
ORDERS-
ORDERS-
ORDERS-
OBJECTION TO I.A
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 28-03-2026 | ORDERS- | |
| 17-03-2026 | ORDERS- | |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDERS- | |
| 21-02-2026 | OBJECTION TO I.A |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Afzalpur rejected the interim application (IA No-3) filed by Defendant No-2 seeking a temporary injunction to restrain the plaintiff from interfering with cultivation of disputed agricultural properties. The court found that Defendant No-2 failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss, noting that the plaintiff's partition suit involves competing claims over the properties and that granting the injunction would harm the plaintiff's rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Afzalpur rejected the interim application (IA No-3) filed by Defendant No-2 seeking a temporary injunction to restrain the plaintiff from interfering with cultivation of disputed agricultural properties. The court found that Defendant No-2 failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss, noting that the plaintiff's partition suit involves competing claims over the properties and that granting the injunction would harm the plaintiff's rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts