HALAPPA S/O PEERAPPA SAPPANGOL vs PEERAPPA S/O AMBANNA SAPPANGOL — 93/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section VII,1,26. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB310002202025

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

Next Hearing

28th April 2026

e-Filing Number

05-07-2025

Filing Number

93/2025

Filing Date

09-07-2025

Registration No

93/2025

Registration Date

09-07-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR

Judge

974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section VII,1,26

Petitioner(s)

HALAPPA S/O PEERAPPA SAPPANGOL

Adv. ISHWAR PKAMALAPURKAR

Respondent(s)

PEERAPPA S/O AMBANNA SAPPANGOL

BHAGYASHREE W/O MAHADEVAPPA HANAMANTGOL

SHARANAMMA W/O SUDHAKAR

RESHMA W/O SIDDU

DEVENDRAPPA S/O PEERAPPA DIED BY LRs(Legal Heir)

Hearing History

Judge: 974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.

07-04-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

28-03-2026

ORDERS-

17-03-2026

ORDERS-

07-03-2026

ORDERS-

21-02-2026

OBJECTION TO I.A

Interim Orders

19-09-2025
Deposition
06-01-2026
Orders
06-01-2026
Issue
07-04-2026
Orders

SUMMARY: The Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Afzalpur rejected the interim application (IA No-3) filed by Defendant No-2 seeking a temporary injunction to restrain the plaintiff from interfering with cultivation of disputed agricultural properties. The court found that Defendant No-2 failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss, noting that the plaintiff's partition suit involves competing claims over the properties and that granting the injunction would harm the plaintiff's rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Afzalpur rejected the interim application (IA No-3) filed by Defendant No-2 seeking a temporary injunction to restrain the plaintiff from interfering with cultivation of disputed agricultural properties. The court found that Defendant No-2 failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss, noting that the plaintiff's partition suit involves competing claims over the properties and that granting the injunction would harm the plaintiff's rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case