Laxmi D/o Late Ashok Golasar Age-22 Yrs. Occu-Student R/o Atnoor, Tq. Afzalpur Dist. Kalaburagi vs Ratnabai W/o Late Gurulingappa Golasar Age-75 Yrs. Occu.Household R/o Atnoor, Tq. Afzalpur Dist.Klb — 53/2022
Case under U/o Vii Rule R/w U/sec 26 of Cpc Section 1and2CPC. Status: CROSS OF PW1 FINALLY. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB310002162022
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
53/2022
Filing Date
01-08-2022
Registration No
53/2022
Registration Date
02-08-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR
Judge
974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Laxmi D/o Late Ashok Golasar Age-22 Yrs. Occu-Student R/o Atnoor, Tq. Afzalpur Dist. Kalaburagi
Adv. A.S. Kerur Adv.
Priyanka D/o Late Ashok Golasar Age-20 Yrs. Occu-Student R/o Atnoor, Tq. Afzalpur Dist.Klb
Gangabai W/o Late Ashok Golasar Age-43 Yrs. Occu-Household, R/o Atnoor, Tq. Afzalpur Dist.Klb
Respondent(s)
Ratnabai W/o Late Gurulingappa Golasar Age-75 Yrs. Occu.Household R/o Atnoor, Tq. Afzalpur Dist.Klb
Bindusar S/o Late Gurulingappa Golasar Age-58 Yrs. Occu-Agri. R/o Atnoor, Tq. Afzalpur Dist.Klb
Vishwanath S/o Late Gurulingappa Golasar Age-55 Yrs. Occu-Agri. R/o Atnoor, Tq. Afzalpur Dist.Klb
Smt. Annapurna W/o Siddu D/o Late Gurulingappa Golasar Age-53 Yrs. Occu-HH. R/o Balurgi Tq. Afzalpur
Mallu @ Mallikarjun S/o Late Gurulingappa Golasar Age-51 Yrs. Occu-Agri. R/o Atnoor, Tq. Afzalpur
Smt. Gourabai W/o Tanaji Age-47 Yrs. Occu-Household, R/o Atnoor, Tq. Afzalpur Dist.Klb
The Special Land Acquisition Officer Mini Vidhan Soudha, Kalaburagi
Hearing History
Judge: 974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.
CROSS OF PW1 FINALLY
CROSS OF PW1 FINALLY
ORDERS-
ORDERS-
TO HEAR
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-04-2026 | CROSS OF PW1 FINALLY |
| 15-04-2026 | CROSS OF PW1 FINALLY |
| 10-04-2026 | ORDERS- |
| 04-04-2026 | ORDERS- |
| 02-04-2026 | TO HEAR |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS No. 53/2022 The court rejected the plaintiffs' application (IA No-10) to implead Mallamma as Defendant No-8 in their partition suit. The plaintiffs sought to include two additional properties (Survey Nos. 366/1 and 365) allegedly omitted from their original plaint. However, the court found the application lacked merit, noting that Defendant No-1 (Ratnabai) had sold the property to Mallamma in 2000, the deceased father (Ashok) never challenged the sale, and the plaintiffs failed to produce sufficient documentary evidence or demonstrate legal rights over the properties. The application was dismissed as an attempt to delay proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS No. 53/2022 The court rejected the plaintiffs' application (IA No-10) to implead Mallamma as Defendant No-8 in their partition suit. The plaintiffs sought to include two additional properties (Survey Nos. 366/1 and 365) allegedly omitted from their original plaint. However, the court found the application lacked merit, noting that Defendant No-1 (Ratnabai) had sold the property to Mallamma in 2000, the deceased father (Ashok) never challenged the sale, and the plaintiffs failed to produce sufficient documentary evidence or demonstrate legal rights over the properties. The application was dismissed as an attempt to delay proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts