Raghotamma S/o Parushurama Kodate vs Pritikha W/o Raghotamma Kodate — 27/2025

Case under U/s 9 of Hindu Marriage Act 1956 Section 9. Status: Evidence-CIVIL. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Evidence-CIVIL Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

M.C. - MATRIMONIAL CASES

CNR: KAKB310002102025

e-Filing Number

01-07-2025

Filing Number

27/2025

Filing Date

03-Jul-2025

Registration No

27/2025

Registration Date

03-Jul-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR

Judge

974-Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 9 of Hindu Marriage Act 1956 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Raghotamma S/o Parushurama Kodate

    Adv. Anilkumar Jamadar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pritikha W/o Raghotamma Kodate

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary of Case 27/2025 In this matrimonial dispute heard on 19-02-2026, petitioner Raghotamma alleged that his wife Pritikha abandoned him after only one month of marriage (solemnized 29-11-2024) and returned to her parents' home without his knowledge. He claimed he had made settlement offers through counsel seeking reconciliation. The respondent filed a reply denying the allegations. The court recorded the petitioner's statement affirming his willingness for reconciliation and noted that the respondent was also willing to resume cohabitation. No final order/verdict was issued; the case was adjourned for further proceedings with witness examination scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  10. 09-Feb-2026

    Cross Of Pw1 Finally

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  11. 06-Jan-2026

    Cross Of Pw1 Finally

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  12. 09-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  13. 09-Dec-2025

    Cross Of Pw1 Finally

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  14. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  15. 12-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  16. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  17. 17-Oct-2025

    Objection To I.A

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  18. 19-Sep-2025

    Objection To I.A

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  19. 09-Sep-2025

    Objection To I.A

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  20. 16-Aug-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  21. 04-Aug-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  22. 03-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 03-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 27/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 27/2025 In this matrimonial dispute heard on 19-02-2026, petitioner Raghotamma alleged that his wife Pritikha abandoned him after only one month of marriage (solemnized 29-11-2024) and returned to her parents' home without his knowledge. He claimed he had made settlement offers through counsel seeking reconciliation. The respondent filed a reply denying the allegations. The court recorded the petitioner's statement affirming his willingness for reconciliation and noted that the respondent was also willing to resume cohabitation. No final order/verdict was issued; the case was adjourned for further proceedings with witness examination scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case