Raghotamma S/o Parushurama Kodate vs Pritikha W/o Raghotamma Kodate — 27/2025
Case under U/s 9 of Hindu Marriage Act 1956 Section 9. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
M.C. - MATRIMONIAL CASES
CNR: KAKB310002102025
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
01-07-2025
Filing Number
27/2025
Filing Date
03-07-2025
Registration No
27/2025
Registration Date
03-07-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR
Judge
974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raghotamma S/o Parushurama Kodate
Adv. Anilkumar Jamadar
Respondent(s)
Pritikha W/o Raghotamma Kodate
Hearing History
Judge: 974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-06-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 29-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 22-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 02-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 27/2025 In this matrimonial dispute heard on 19-02-2026, petitioner Raghotamma alleged that his wife Pritikha abandoned him after only one month of marriage (solemnized 29-11-2024) and returned to her parents' home without his knowledge. He claimed he had made settlement offers through counsel seeking reconciliation. The respondent filed a reply denying the allegations. The court recorded the petitioner's statement affirming his willingness for reconciliation and noted that the respondent was also willing to resume cohabitation. No final order/verdict was issued; the case was adjourned for further proceedings with witness examination scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 27/2025 In this matrimonial dispute heard on 19-02-2026, petitioner Raghotamma alleged that his wife Pritikha abandoned him after only one month of marriage (solemnized 29-11-2024) and returned to her parents' home without his knowledge. He claimed he had made settlement offers through counsel seeking reconciliation. The respondent filed a reply denying the allegations. The court recorded the petitioner's statement affirming his willingness for reconciliation and noted that the respondent was also willing to resume cohabitation. No final order/verdict was issued; the case was adjourned for further proceedings with witness examination scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts