Revanasiddappa S/o Late Shamaraya Paryan vs Danamma W/o Late Chandappa Paryan — 57/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Contested--DECREED OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB310001552025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

22-04-2025

Filing Number

57/2025

Filing Date

28-04-2025

Registration No

57/2025

Registration Date

28-04-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR

Judge

974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 26

Petitioner(s)

Revanasiddappa S/o Late Shamaraya Paryan

Adv. Manjunath M Kolli

Respondent(s)

Danamma W/o Late Chandappa Paryan

Shankar S/o Late Shamaraya Paryan

Surekha W/o Shankar Paryan

Hearing History

Judge: 974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.

07-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

23-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

04-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

29-01-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Judgment

Summary The court decreed the plaintiff's suit for partition of ancestral joint family properties, awarding him a 1/3rd share in the suit properties along with defendant No-1 (widow of deceased brother) and defendant No-2 (surviving brother), each entitled to 1/3rd share. Defendant No-3 (wife of defendant No-2) was denied any share as she is not a joint family member. The court found the properties to be ancestral based on revenue records showing ownership tracing back to the grandfather, establishing the plaintiff's partition rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

29-10-2025
Issue
10-12-2025
Orders
08-01-2026
Deposition
29-01-2026
Deposition
04-02-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court decreed the plaintiff's suit for partition of ancestral joint family properties, awarding him a 1/3rd share in the suit properties along with defendant No-1 (widow of deceased brother) and defendant No-2 (surviving brother), each entitled to 1/3rd share. Defendant No-3 (wife of defendant No-2) was denied any share as she is not a joint family member. The court found the properties to be ancestral based on revenue records showing ownership tracing back to the grandfather, establishing the plaintiff's partition rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case