Revanasiddappa S/o Late Shamaraya Paryan vs Danamma W/o Late Chandappa Paryan — 57/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Contested--DECREED OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB310001552025
e-Filing Number
22-04-2025
Filing Number
57/2025
Filing Date
28-04-2025
Registration No
57/2025
Registration Date
28-04-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR
Judge
974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Revanasiddappa S/o Late Shamaraya Paryan
Adv. Manjunath M Kolli
Respondent(s)
Danamma W/o Late Chandappa Paryan
Shankar S/o Late Shamaraya Paryan
Surekha W/o Shankar Paryan
Hearing History
Judge: 974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 23-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 04-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court decreed the plaintiff's suit for partition of ancestral joint family properties, awarding him a 1/3rd share in the suit properties along with defendant No-1 (widow of deceased brother) and defendant No-2 (surviving brother), each entitled to 1/3rd share. Defendant No-3 (wife of defendant No-2) was denied any share as she is not a joint family member. The court found the properties to be ancestral based on revenue records showing ownership tracing back to the grandfather, establishing the plaintiff's partition rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court decreed the plaintiff's suit for partition of ancestral joint family properties, awarding him a 1/3rd share in the suit properties along with defendant No-1 (widow of deceased brother) and defendant No-2 (surviving brother), each entitled to 1/3rd share. Defendant No-3 (wife of defendant No-2) was denied any share as she is not a joint family member. The court found the properties to be ancestral based on revenue records showing ownership tracing back to the grandfather, establishing the plaintiff's partition rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts