JAGADEVI W/O SHARANAPPA NAVLEKAR vs SUVARNA W/O SOMARAY KUTNOOR — 48/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section VIIRULE1AND2. Status: Evidence-CIVIL. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

Evidence-CIVIL Next hearing 06-Jun-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB310001362025

e-Filing Number

07-04-2025

Filing Number

48/2025

Filing Date

19-Apr-2025

Registration No

48/2025

Registration Date

19-Apr-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR

Judge

974-Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section VIIRULE1AND2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGADEVI W/O SHARANAPPA NAVLEKAR

    Adv. Shrishail Patil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUVARNA W/O SOMARAY KUTNOOR

  2. 2.SAVITA W/O CHIDANAND NILOOR

  3. 3.The Branch Manager, Pragati Krishna Grameen Bank, Station Ganagapur

Case History

  1. 06-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  7. 14-Jan-2026

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  8. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence-CIVIL

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  9. 28-Nov-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  10. 03-Nov-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  11. 10-Oct-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  12. 08-Oct-2025

    IssueView PDF

  13. 08-Oct-2025

    OrdersView PDF

  14. 08-Oct-2025

    OrdersView PDF

  15. 08-Oct-2025

    OrdersView PDF

  16. 08-Oct-2025

    OrdersView PDF

  17. 08-Oct-2025

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: In this partition suit (O.S. No. 48/2025), the court allowed the plaintiff's application to implead Pragati Krishna Grameen Bank (Station Ganagapur) as Defendant No. 3. The plaintiff argued that funds in the grandfather's name held by the bank are subject to the partition claim, and the bank manager's presence is necessary for effectual adjudication as Defendants No. 1 and 2 allegedly colluded with the bank to access the amount. The bank did not appear or object after notice, and the court found the bank's presence essential to the suit's proper resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 08-Oct-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  19. 20-Sep-2025

    Orders-

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  20. 12-Sep-2025

    Orders-

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  21. 09-Sep-2025

    To Hear

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  22. 06-Sep-2025

    To Hear

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  23. 30-Aug-2025

    To Hear

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  24. 16-Aug-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  25. 04-Aug-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  26. 08-Jul-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  27. 09-Jun-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  28. 05-Jun-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  29. 21-Apr-2025

    OrdersView PDF

  30. 21-Apr-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge and J.M.F.C. ,Afzalpur.

  31. 19-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 19-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 48/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In this partition suit (O.S. No. 48/2025), the court allowed the plaintiff's application to implead Pragati Krishna Grameen Bank (Station Ganagapur) as Defendant No. 3. The plaintiff argued that funds in the grandfather's name held by the bank are subject to the partition claim, and the bank manager's presence is necessary for effectual adjudication as Defendants No. 1 and 2 allegedly colluded with the bank to access the amount. The bank did not appear or object after notice, and the court found the bank's presence essential to the suit's proper resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case