RAJESH S/O GURUNARH AMBURE AGE.55 YEARS OCC. AGRI AND LABOUR R/O AFZALAPUR PRESENT MUMBAI vs VILAS S/O GURUNATH AMBURE AGE.61 YRS. OCC.AGRI AND LABOUR R/O AFZALAPUR — 31/2023
Case under Order 7 Rule 10 Cpc Section ORDER,7,RULE,1,AND,2. Status: ORDERS-. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB310001182023
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
e-Filing Number
13-04-2023
Filing Number
31/2023
Filing Date
13-04-2023
Registration No
31/2023
Registration Date
13-04-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR
Judge
974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJESH S/O GURUNARH AMBURE AGE.55 YEARS OCC. AGRI AND LABOUR R/O AFZALAPUR PRESENT MUMBAI
Adv. Pujari Sharadkumar
Respondent(s)
VILAS S/O GURUNATH AMBURE AGE.61 YRS. OCC.AGRI AND LABOUR R/O AFZALAPUR
Nikhil S/o Vilas Ambure Age-30yrs. Occu-Service R/o Afzalpur Now at Mumbai
Nalini W/o Manohar Patange Age-58yrs. Occu-HH. R/o Virathan (Khurd) Post Virathan Tq. Dist. Palghar
Mangla W/o Ashok Khamitakar Age-57yrs. Occu-HH. R/o Manjarekar Marg, Sardar Nagar SION Mumbai-400022
Pramila deceased by Dinesh s/o Ashok Halale Age-43Yrs. Occu-Service R/o Morivlipada Ambarnath (E)
Deepti D/o Ashok Halale Age-40yrs. Occu-Service R/o No.174 Parekh Mahal Lady Jemshedaji Road Mumbai
Hearing History
Judge: 974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.
ORDERS-
OBJECTION TO I.A
OBJECTION TO I.A
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | ORDERS- | |
| 01-04-2026 | OBJECTION TO I.A | |
| 28-03-2026 | OBJECTION TO I.A | |
| 27-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 24-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Summary In OS No-31/2023, the court rejected Applications IA No-5 and 6 filed by Defendants 1 and 2 seeking to recall PW-1 for further cross-examination. The court found that the defendants lacked diligence, failed to present sufficient grounds for recall, and had remained silent through 38 adjournments before filing the application at the arguments stage, thereby rendering them ineligible for discretionary relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In OS No-31/2023, the court rejected Applications IA No-5 and 6 filed by Defendants 1 and 2 seeking to recall PW-1 for further cross-examination. The court found that the defendants lacked diligence, failed to present sufficient grounds for recall, and had remained silent through 38 adjournments before filing the application at the arguments stage, thereby rendering them ineligible for discretionary relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts