BASAVANTRAY S/O DATTAPPA BIJJARAGI AGE 34 YRS OCC AGRI vs RAMESH S/O DHAREPPA CHOUDARI AGE 42 YRS OCC DRIVER — 21/2026
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 R/w 26 of Cpc Section 7,1,2,26. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED BY ADR on 24th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB310000942026
e-Filing Number
11-02-2026
Filing Number
19/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
21/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR
Judge
974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.
Decision Date
24th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED BY ADR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BASAVANTRAY S/O DATTAPPA BIJJARAGI AGE 34 YRS OCC AGRI
Adv. Shrishail Patil
SHOBHA W/O CRASH ANT AGE 32 YRS OCC HH
Adv. Shrishail Patil
Respondent(s)
RAMESH S/O DHAREPPA CHOUDARI AGE 42 YRS OCC DRIVER
ANASUBAI D/O DHAREPPA AGE 44 YRS OCC HH
GURANNA S/O DHAREPPA CHOUDARI AGE 45 YRS OCC AGRI
SACHIN S/O NINGAPPA AVARAD AGE 35 YRS OCC DOCTOR
KIRAN S/O NINGAPPA AVARAD AGE 26 YRS OCC AGRI
Hearing History
Judge: 974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.
Disposed
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-04-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 13-03-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 18-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: OS 21/2026 The court accepted a compromise petition filed jointly by all parties under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC. The plaintiffs and defendants settled their property dispute wherein plaintiffs and defendant No-2 received 2 Tolas of gold from defendant No-3 in exchange for relinquishing their rights in the suit properties. The court, finding no force or coercion and full consent from both parties, disposed of the suit in accordance with the compromise terms and directed the office to draw a formal decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS 21/2026 The court accepted a compromise petition filed jointly by all parties under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC. The plaintiffs and defendants settled their property dispute wherein plaintiffs and defendant No-2 received 2 Tolas of gold from defendant No-3 in exchange for relinquishing their rights in the suit properties. The court, finding no force or coercion and full consent from both parties, disposed of the suit in accordance with the compromise terms and directed the office to draw a formal decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts