Hussain sab S/o Khaseem Sab Averi Alias Mudnalli Age 50 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Afzalpur Tq AFzalpur vs Fatima Bee W/o Abdul Raheman Age 48 Yrs Occ Household R/o Afzalpur Tq Afzalpur — 10/2025
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section U/o,7,rule,1,and,2,of,cpc. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB310000322025
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
e-Filing Number
08-01-2025
Filing Number
10/2025
Filing Date
17-01-2025
Registration No
10/2025
Registration Date
17-01-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR
Judge
974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hussain sab S/o Khaseem Sab Averi Alias Mudnalli Age 50 Yrs Occ Agri R/o Afzalpur Tq AFzalpur
Adv. Siddappa Guttedar
Respondent(s)
Fatima Bee W/o Abdul Raheman Age 48 Yrs Occ Household R/o Afzalpur Tq Afzalpur
Hearing History
Judge: 974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
CROSS OF PW1 FINALLY
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 24-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 02-02-2026 | CROSS OF PW1 FINALLY |
Interim Orders
This document is in Kannada and appears to be a civil property dispute case (O.A.S. No. 10/2025). The court order discusses a land ownership matter involving property survey number 357, with disputes between parties regarding ownership claims dating back to 1963. The court found that the plaintiff's witness provided false testimony and submitted fabricated documents to support the plaintiff's case. The court dismissed the appeal/petition and rejected the plaintiff's claims regarding the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is in Kannada and appears to be a civil property dispute case (O.A.S. No. 10/2025). The court order discusses a land ownership matter involving property survey number 357, with disputes between parties regarding ownership claims dating back to 1963. The court found that the plaintiff's witness provided false testimony and submitted fabricated documents to support the plaintiff's case. The court dismissed the appeal/petition and rejected the plaintiff's claims regarding the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts