Shashikala W/o Chandrasha Gadekar, Age.35 Yrs, R/o Hodlur, Now residing at village Sangolagi (G), vs Chandrasha S/o Laxman Gadekar, Age.40 Yrs, — 1444/2022

Case under Criminal.misc Section 125CRPC. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB220134972022

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

24th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1444/2022

Filing Date

06-12-2022

Registration No

1444/2022

Registration Date

06-12-2022

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND

Judge

324-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland

Acts & Sections

Criminal.Misc Section 125CRPC

Petitioner(s)

Shashikala W/o Chandrasha Gadekar, Age.35 Yrs, R/o Hodlur, Now residing at village Sangolagi (G),

Adv. R.J.Patil

Mahesh S/o Chandrasha Gadekar, Age.15 Yrs,

Respondent(s)

Chandrasha S/o Laxman Gadekar, Age.40 Yrs,

Hearing History

Judge: 324-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland

04-04-2026

EVIDENCE

25-03-2026

EVIDENCE

07-03-2026

NOTICE

04-03-2026

ORDERS..

02-03-2026

ORDERS..

Interim Orders

06-12-2022
Orders
04-01-2024
Deposition
09-08-2024
Deposition
04-11-2024
Deposition
15-03-2025
Deposition
17-03-2025
Deposition
27-06-2025
Deposition

The case (Crl.M. No. 1444/2022) heard on 27.06.2025 addresses a dispute between parties regarding property and family matters. The court acknowledged the petitioner's contentions regarding property possession, family separation, and alleged disputes with the respondent, but found insufficient grounds to intervene in what appears to be a domestic/civil matter. The petition is disposed of, with the court suggesting the parties resolve their differences through proper legal channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The case (Crl.M. No. 1444/2022) heard on 27.06.2025 addresses a dispute between parties regarding property and family matters. The court acknowledged the petitioner's contentions regarding property possession, family separation, and alleged disputes with the respondent, but found insufficient grounds to intervene in what appears to be a domestic/civil matter. The petition is disposed of, with the court suggesting the parties resolve their differences through proper legal channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case