Parveen Begum D/o Abbas Ali Siddiqui Age 60 Yrs Occ Household. vs The Registrar Of Birth And Death, through Cheif Officer TMC, Aland — 4147/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 26th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB220126052025
Filing Number
4147/2025
Filing Date
22-Dec-2025
Registration No
4147/2025
Registration Date
22-Dec-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND
Judge
324-Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 14-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Parveen Begum D/o Abbas Ali Siddiqui Age 60 Yrs Occ Household.
Adv. Devanand Hodloorkar
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Registrar Of Birth And Death, through Cheif Officer TMC, Aland
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Orders
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.No.4147/2025 Court Decision: The court allowed the petition and directed the Registrar of Birth and Death to register 60-year-old Parveen Begum's birth (11-06-1965) in official records and issue her a birth certificate. The petitioner's birth was never registered due to administrative oversight, preventing her access to government benefits. The court accepted her testimony, supported by a Pan Card and non-availability certificate, finding sufficient evidence of her birth date and non-registration despite the respondent's absence from proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
16-Mar-2026
Orders.
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
12-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 4147/2025
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.No.4147/2025 Court Decision: The court allowed the petition and directed the Registrar of Birth and Death to register 60-year-old Parveen Begum's birth (11-06-1965) in official records and issue her a birth certificate. The petitioner's birth was never registered due to administrative oversight, preventing her access to government benefits. The court accepted her testimony, supported by a Pan Card and non-availability certificate, finding sufficient evidence of her birth date and non-registration despite the respondent's absence from proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts