Abdul S/o Akbarsab Age 16 Yrs U/g of Father. R/o Mataki vs The Registrar Of Birth And Death, through Tahasildar Aland — 4023/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 06th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB220123662025
Filing Number
4023/2025
Filing Date
11-12-2025
Registration No
4023/2025
Registration Date
11-12-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND
Judge
324-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Abdul S/o Akbarsab Age 16 Yrs U/g of Father. R/o Mataki
Adv. L S Pujari Advocate
Respondent(s)
The Registrar Of Birth And Death, through Tahasildar Aland
Hearing History
Judge: 324-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland
Disposed
ORDERS..
NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-02-2026 | ORDERS.. |
| 30-12-2025 | NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed a petition by 16-year-old Abdul under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Registrar to register his birth date as 07-01-2009 and issue a birth certificate. The court found that the petitioner had provided sufficient evidence through his father's testimony and documentary proof (school certificate and non-availability certificate) to establish that his birth was not registered due to oversight, and that the respondent's failure to contest the claim left it unchallenged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed a petition by 16-year-old Abdul under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Registrar to register his birth date as 07-01-2009 and issue a birth certificate. The court found that the petitioner had provided sufficient evidence through his father's testimony and documentary proof (school certificate and non-availability certificate) to establish that his birth was not registered due to oversight, and that the respondent's failure to contest the claim left it unchallenged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts