Shaukat Ali Adamali Jigrani S/o Adamali Jigrani Age 61 Yrs Occ Pvt Work. R/o Mumbai vs The Registrar Of Birth And Death, TMC, Aland — 4019/2025

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB220123562025

Filing Number

4019/2025

Filing Date

11-Dec-2025

Registration No

4019/2025

Registration Date

11-Dec-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND

Judge

324-Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 13-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shaukat Ali Adamali Jigrani S/o Adamali Jigrani Age 61 Yrs Occ Pvt Work. R/o Mumbai

    Adv. K.M.Serikar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Registrar Of Birth And Death, TMC, Aland

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Summary The court allowed the petitioner's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Registrar to register his birth date (12-05-1964) and issue a birth certificate. The petitioner proved through his affidavit and documents (non-availability certificate and PAN card) that his birth was never registered due to oversight, and the respondent failed to contest his claim despite being served notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    Orders..

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

  5. 30-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4019/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed the petitioner's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Registrar to register his birth date (12-05-1964) and issue a birth certificate. The petitioner proved through his affidavit and documents (non-availability certificate and PAN card) that his birth was never registered due to oversight, and the respondent failed to contest his claim despite being served notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case