Reshma W/o Basha Sab Nellur Age 39 Yrs Occ Household. R/o Hallisalagar Village vs The Registrar Of Birth And Death, through Tahasildar Aland — 3790/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB220111062025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3790/2025
Filing Date
06-12-2025
Registration No
3790/2025
Registration Date
06-12-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND
Judge
324-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Reshma W/o Basha Sab Nellur Age 39 Yrs Occ Household. R/o Hallisalagar Village
Adv. K.M. Serikar
Respondent(s)
The Registrar Of Birth And Death, through Tahasildar Aland
Hearing History
Judge: 324-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland
Disposed
ORDERS..
NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-02-2026 | ORDERS.. | |
| 17-12-2025 | NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court allowed Reshma's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969 for late registration of her birth. The court found that the petitioner's testimony, supported by documentary evidence (non-availability certificate and PAN card), sufficiently proved her date of birth as 01-06-1990 at Hallisalagar Village, and that this birth was never registered due to oversight. The court directed the respondent registrar to register her birth and issue a birth certificate upon collection of prescribed fees, with a clarification that this order is not conclusive proof if the date of birth is disputed in future civil or criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court allowed Reshma's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969 for late registration of her birth. The court found that the petitioner's testimony, supported by documentary evidence (non-availability certificate and PAN card), sufficiently proved her date of birth as 01-06-1990 at Hallisalagar Village, and that this birth was never registered due to oversight. The court directed the respondent registrar to register her birth and issue a birth certificate upon collection of prescribed fees, with a clarification that this order is not conclusive proof if the date of birth is disputed in future civil or criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts