Sakshi D/o Mallikarjun Sapale Age 13 Yrs U/g of Mother. R/o Chincholi B vs The Registrar Of Birth And Death, through Tahasildar Aland — 3789/2025

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 06th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB220111052025

Case disposed

Filing Number

3789/2025

Filing Date

06-12-2025

Registration No

3789/2025

Registration Date

06-12-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND

Judge

324-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii)

Petitioner(s)

Sakshi D/o Mallikarjun Sapale Age 13 Yrs U/g of Mother. R/o Chincholi B

Adv. Sharanabasappa Gadaballi

Respondent(s)

The Registrar Of Birth And Death, through Tahasildar Aland

Hearing History

Judge: 324-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland

06-03-2026

Disposed

10-02-2026

ORDERS..

17-12-2025

NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
Orders

Summary The court allowed the petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Registrar to register 13-year-old Sakshi's birth (dated 15-06-2013) in official records and issue a birth certificate. The court found credible evidence through the mother's testimony and school documents proving the birth occurred but was never registered due to administrative oversight, causing hardship for school admission and government benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed the petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Registrar to register 13-year-old Sakshi's birth (dated 15-06-2013) in official records and issue a birth certificate. The court found credible evidence through the mother's testimony and school documents proving the birth occurred but was never registered due to administrative oversight, causing hardship for school admission and government benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case