Afreen Begum D/o Mainoddin Age 32 Yrs Occ Household. R/o Aland vs The Registrar Of Birth And Death, through The Cheif Officer TMC, Aland — 3785/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 06th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB220111002025
Filing Number
3785/2025
Filing Date
06-Dec-2025
Registration No
3785/2025
Registration Date
06-Dec-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND
Judge
324-Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Afreen Begum D/o Mainoddin Age 32 Yrs Occ Household. R/o Aland
Adv. Devanand Hodloorkar
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Registrar Of Birth And Death, through The Cheif Officer TMC, Aland
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, and directed the respondent to register Afreen Begum's birth on 01-06-1993 at Bagwan Galli Dargah Road, Aland, and issue a birth certificate after collecting prescribed fees. The court found that the petitioner's oral testimony and documentary evidence (non-availability certificate and PAN card) sufficiently proved her date of birth and its non-registration, while the respondent failed to contest the claim despite being served notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
10-Feb-2026
Orders..
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
17-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3785/2025
The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, and directed the respondent to register Afreen Begum's birth on 01-06-1993 at Bagwan Galli Dargah Road, Aland, and issue a birth certificate after collecting prescribed fees. The court found that the petitioner's oral testimony and documentary evidence (non-availability certificate and PAN card) sufficiently proved her date of birth and its non-registration, while the respondent failed to contest the claim despite being served notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts