Afreen Begum D/o Mainoddin Age 32 Yrs Occ Household. R/o Aland vs The Registrar Of Birth And Death, through The Cheif Officer TMC, Aland — 3785/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 06th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB220111002025
Filing Number
3785/2025
Filing Date
06-12-2025
Registration No
3785/2025
Registration Date
06-12-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND
Judge
324-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Afreen Begum D/o Mainoddin Age 32 Yrs Occ Household. R/o Aland
Adv. Devanand Hodloorkar
Respondent(s)
The Registrar Of Birth And Death, through The Cheif Officer TMC, Aland
Hearing History
Judge: 324-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland
Disposed
ORDERS..
NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-02-2026 | ORDERS.. |
| 17-12-2025 | NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, and directed the respondent to register Afreen Begum's birth on 01-06-1993 at Bagwan Galli Dargah Road, Aland, and issue a birth certificate after collecting prescribed fees. The court found that the petitioner's oral testimony and documentary evidence (non-availability certificate and PAN card) sufficiently proved her date of birth and its non-registration, while the respondent failed to contest the claim despite being served notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, and directed the respondent to register Afreen Begum's birth on 01-06-1993 at Bagwan Galli Dargah Road, Aland, and issue a birth certificate after collecting prescribed fees. The court found that the petitioner's oral testimony and documentary evidence (non-availability certificate and PAN card) sufficiently proved her date of birth and its non-registration, while the respondent failed to contest the claim despite being served notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts