The PSI Nimbarga P S vs Jainoddin S/o Hasanasab Naikodi, Age. 47Yrs, R/o Hittalshirur Village,Tq - Aland — 6564/2024
Case under Other Law Cases Section 32,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB220099922024
e-Filing Number
06-11-2024
Filing Number
6564/2024
Filing Date
07-Nov-2024
Registration No
6564/2024
Registration Date
07-Nov-2024
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND
Judge
324-Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
Decision Date
02-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 14-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0076
Police Station
NIMBARGA PS
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The PSI Nimbarga P S
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jainoddin S/o Hasanasab Naikodi, Age. 47Yrs, R/o Hittalshirur Village,Tq - Aland
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Jun-2026
Judgment
Case Summary: C.C. No. 6564/2024 Court Decision: The accused, Jainuddin S/o Hasansab Naikodi, was acquitted of all charges under Sections 32 and 34 of the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965, and Section 273 of BNS. Key Reasoning: The court found critical evidentiary gaps in the prosecution's case. The two pancha witnesses (independent witnesses) to the seizure turned hostile and denied any knowledge of the raid or seizure panchanama, undermining the seizure's credibility. The investigating officer failed to obtain a mandatory search warrant before the raid, violated procedural requirements, and did not record statements from independent witnesses. The court determined there was insufficient cogent evidence to establish a direct nexus between the accused and the seized liquor, resulting in reasonable doubt. Consequently, the accused received the benefit of doubt and was acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
25-May-2026
Judgments
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
19-May-2026
313 Statement
-
19-May-2026
Arguments.
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
28-Apr-2026
Appearance Of Accussed
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
23-Apr-2026
Appearance Of Accussed
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
15-Apr-2026
Appearance Of Accussed
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
10-Apr-2026
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
07-Apr-2026
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
04-Apr-2026
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
02-Apr-2026
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
26-Mar-2026
Deposition
-
26-Mar-2026
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
30-Dec-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
22-Dec-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
05-Dec-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
07-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
23-Oct-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
02-Aug-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
30-Jun-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
06-May-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
01-Apr-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
27-Feb-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
27-Jan-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
23-Dec-2024
Appearance Of Accussed
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
07-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 6564/2024
Case Summary: C.C. No. 6564/2024 Court Decision: The accused, Jainuddin S/o Hasansab Naikodi, was acquitted of all charges under Sections 32 and 34 of the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965, and Section 273 of BNS. Key Reasoning: The court found critical evidentiary gaps in the prosecution's case. The two pancha witnesses (independent witnesses) to the seizure turned hostile and denied any knowledge of the raid or seizure panchanama, undermining the seizure's credibility. The investigating officer failed to obtain a mandatory search warrant before the raid, violated procedural requirements, and did not record statements from independent witnesses. The court determined there was insufficient cogent evidence to establish a direct nexus between the accused and the seized liquor, resulting in reasonable doubt. Consequently, the accused received the benefit of doubt and was acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts