Babar Ali Ismail Sab Mulla S/o Ismail Sab Mulla, Age. 66Yr,Occ. Labour R/o Aland vs The Chief Officer TMC Aland — 3177/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB220095092025
Filing Number
3177/2025
Filing Date
31-Oct-2025
Registration No
3177/2025
Registration Date
31-Oct-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND
Judge
324-Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Babar Ali Ismail Sab Mulla S/o Ismail Sab Mulla, Age. 66Yr,Occ. Labour R/o Aland
Adv. Ramesh Malkappa Tole
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Chief Officer TMC Aland
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary: The Principal Civil Judge of Aland allowed a petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, filed by 66-year-old Babar Ali Ismail Sab Mulla to register his birth that had been overlooked. The court found the petitioner's testimony, supported by a non-availability certificate and passbook, credible and sufficient to establish his birth on 02-01-1959. The Registrar of Birth and Death was directed to enter the birth details in official records and issue a birth certificate upon collection of prescribed fees, though the court clarified this order would not constitute conclusive proof if disputed in civil or criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
10-Feb-2026
Orders..
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
07-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3177/2025
Summary: The Principal Civil Judge of Aland allowed a petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, filed by 66-year-old Babar Ali Ismail Sab Mulla to register his birth that had been overlooked. The court found the petitioner's testimony, supported by a non-availability certificate and passbook, credible and sufficient to establish his birth on 02-01-1959. The Registrar of Birth and Death was directed to enter the birth details in official records and issue a birth certificate upon collection of prescribed fees, though the court clarified this order would not constitute conclusive proof if disputed in civil or criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts