THE PI ALAND vs Basavaraj S/O Paramesawar Pujari Age 42 R/O Savalesawar — 3659/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,324,354,504,506,34,ipc. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB220048732023
Filing Number
3659/2023
Filing Date
04-Aug-2023
Registration No
3659/2023
Registration Date
04-Aug-2023
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND
Judge
324-Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
Last updated 14-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
96
Police Station
ALAND PS
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE PI ALAND
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Basavaraj S/O Paramesawar Pujari Age 42 R/O Savalesawar
-
2.A2- Santoshkumar S/o Paramesawar Pujari Age 40 R/o Savalesawar
Case History
-
24-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
21-Apr-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
18-Apr-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
26-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
29-Jan-2026
Deposition
Case Summary: CC 3659/2023 Court Order Date: 29-01-2026 Outcome: Petition DISMISSED. No further hearing ordered. This civil case involved a property dispute concerning shop number 1-75 and agricultural land parcels (survey numbers 171, 11, 144, 169, 13) in Savalesawar. The petitioner claimed the property should not be partitioned to the respondents (Basavaraj and Santoshkumar), alleging the respondents assaulted the petitioner and a witness on 28-05-2023 over the partition dispute. The court examined witness testimony regarding the assault and property division issues. After hearing arguments and reviewing evidence, the court found insufficient grounds to grant relief and dismissed the petition without ordering further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
06-Dec-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
03-Oct-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
28-Aug-2025
Deposition
-
28-Aug-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
27-Jun-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
20-May-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
24-Apr-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
26-Mar-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
03-Feb-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
30-Dec-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
04-Nov-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
08-Oct-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
09-Sep-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
07-Aug-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
15-Jul-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
24-Jun-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
20-May-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
03-Apr-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
28-Feb-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
17-Feb-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
12-Jan-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
14-Dec-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
01-Dec-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
17-Nov-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
16-Oct-2023
Charge
-
16-Oct-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
25-Sep-2023
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
07-Aug-2023
Orders
-
07-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 3659/2023
Case Summary: CC 3659/2023 Court Order Date: 29-01-2026 Outcome: Petition DISMISSED. No further hearing ordered. This civil case involved a property dispute concerning shop number 1-75 and agricultural land parcels (survey numbers 171, 11, 144, 169, 13) in Savalesawar. The petitioner claimed the property should not be partitioned to the respondents (Basavaraj and Santoshkumar), alleging the respondents assaulted the petitioner and a witness on 28-05-2023 over the partition dispute. The court examined witness testimony regarding the assault and property division issues. After hearing arguments and reviewing evidence, the court found insufficient grounds to grant relief and dismissed the petition without ordering further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts