The PSI, Aland PS vs Sandipa s/o pandu Rathoda, Age 25 yrs, R/o ,Apte tanda,tq alandKalaburagi, Karnataka — 2413/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,351(2),115(2),118(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAKB220039832025

e-Filing Number

26-06-2025

Filing Number

2413/2025

Filing Date

26-Jun-2025

Registration No

2413/2025

Registration Date

26-Jun-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND

Judge

324-Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0264

Police Station

ALAND PS

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,351(2),115(2),118(1),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The PSI, Aland PS (Police Station)

    Adv. Shri. Ismail Patel APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sandipa s/o pandu Rathoda, Age 25 yrs, R/o ,Apte tanda,tq alandKalaburagi, Karnataka

  2. 2.Dhanaraj s/o heera pawar Age 28 yrs, R/o ,Apte tanda village,tq alandKalaburagi, Karnataka

    Adv. null

  3. 3.Viswanath s/o heera pawar Age 34 R/o ,Apte tanda,TQ ALANDKalaburagi, Karnataka

    Adv. null

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    SUMMARY The court acquitted all three accused persons (Sandeep, Dhanaraj, and Vishwanath) of charges under sections 352, 351(2), 115(2), and 118(1) BNS (assault, criminal intimidation, and provocation). The judge found that the sole prosecution witness—the complainant himself—turned hostile and testified that the accused never assaulted or threatened him, fatally undermining the prosecution's case and warranting acquittal under benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgments

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    ChargeView PDF

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

  8. 22-Jan-2026

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

  9. 27-Nov-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

  10. 09-Oct-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

  11. 02-Aug-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

  12. 27-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 26-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2413/2025

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The court acquitted all three accused persons (Sandeep, Dhanaraj, and Vishwanath) of charges under sections 352, 351(2), 115(2), and 118(1) BNS (assault, criminal intimidation, and provocation). The judge found that the sole prosecution witness—the complainant himself—turned hostile and testified that the accused never assaulted or threatened him, fatally undermining the prosecution's case and warranting acquittal under benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case