Daulmalik S/o Ismayil Bableshwar Age 37 Yrs Occ Pvt Work. vs The Thasildar Aland. — 1434/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 22nd May 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB220024632026

Filing Number

1434/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

1434/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND

Judge

324-Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

Decision Date

22-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 14-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Daulmalik S/o Ismayil Bableshwar Age 37 Yrs Occ Pvt Work.

    Adv. K.M. Serikar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Thasildar Aland.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-May-2026

    Orders

    The court allowed the petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahasildar to register petitioner Daulmalik's birth (06-06-1988 at Kawalga Village) and issue a birth certificate. The court found the petitioner's testimony and documentary evidence (school transfer certificate) credible and unchallenged, as the respondent failed to appear despite notice. The court clarified this order is not conclusive proof if the birth date is disputed in future civil or criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Orders..

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Notice

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1434/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahasildar to register petitioner Daulmalik's birth (06-06-1988 at Kawalga Village) and issue a birth certificate. The court found the petitioner's testimony and documentary evidence (school transfer certificate) credible and unchallenged, as the respondent failed to appear despite notice. The court clarified this order is not conclusive proof if the birth date is disputed in future civil or criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case