Saatvik S/o Shantappa Patil Age 10 Yrs U/g of Father. vs The Tahasildar Aland — 1433/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB220024622026

Filing Number

1433/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

1433/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND

Judge

324-Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 14-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii)

Petitioner(s)

1.Saatvik S/o Shantappa Patil Age 10 Yrs U/g of Father.

Adv. Devanand H Hodlurkar

Respondent(s)

1.The Tahasildar Aland

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
27-Mar-2026

Orders

Case Summary: 1433/2026 The court allowed the petition filed by 10-year-old Saatvik S/o Shantappa Patil under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, against the Tahasildar of Aland. The petitioner's birth on 31-03-2015 at Jamaga was not registered in the official records due to administrative oversight. Based on testimony from the petitioner's father and supporting documents (non-availability certificate and school study certificate), the court found sufficient grounds for registration. The Tahasildar is directed to register the birth date and issue a birth certificate upon collection of prescribed fees, though the court clarified this order would not be conclusive proof if disputed in future civil or criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
27-Mar-2026

Disposed

Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
26-Mar-2026

Notice

Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
25-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
25-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 1433/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1433/2026 The court allowed the petition filed by 10-year-old Saatvik S/o Shantappa Patil under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, against the Tahasildar of Aland. The petitioner's birth on 31-03-2015 at Jamaga was not registered in the official records due to administrative oversight. Based on testimony from the petitioner's father and supporting documents (non-availability certificate and school study certificate), the court found sufficient grounds for registration. The Tahasildar is directed to register the birth date and issue a birth certificate upon collection of prescribed fees, though the court clarified this order would not be conclusive proof if disputed in future civil or criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.