Santosh S/o Gundappa Jamadar, Age.16 yrs, U/g father Gundappa Age.48 yrs vs The Tahasildar, Aland — 1301/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 06th April 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB220019262026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1301/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

1301/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND

Judge

324-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland

Decision Date

06th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

Santosh S/o Gundappa Jamadar, Age.16 yrs, U/g father Gundappa Age.48 yrs

Adv. K.M. Serikar

Respondent(s)

The Tahasildar, Aland

Hearing History

Judge: 324-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland

06-04-2026

Disposed

04-04-2026

ORDERS..

23-03-2026

EVIDENCE

18-03-2026

NOTICE

14-03-2026

NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

06-04-2026
Orders

Case Summary: Crl. Misc. 1301/2026 The court allowed 16-year-old Santosh's petition for late registration of birth under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969. The petitioner's birth on 28-11-2010 at Basavantwadi Village was never registered due to oversight; the court found his father's testimony and supporting documents (non-availability and bonafide certificates) credible and sufficient proof. The Tahasildar was directed to register the birth and issue a birth certificate upon collection of prescribed fees, though the order was clarified as non-conclusive if disputed in future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl. Misc. 1301/2026 The court allowed 16-year-old Santosh's petition for late registration of birth under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969. The petitioner's birth on 28-11-2010 at Basavantwadi Village was never registered due to oversight; the court found his father's testimony and supporting documents (non-availability and bonafide certificates) credible and sufficient proof. The Tahasildar was directed to register the birth and issue a birth certificate upon collection of prescribed fees, though the order was clarified as non-conclusive if disputed in future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case