EXCISE PS ALAND vs MODIN S/O DASTAGIRI MACHLIBANDAN AGE 45 YRS R/O HIROLLI — 887/2021
Case under Karnataka Excise Act 1965 Section 11,12,14,15,32(1)38A43. Status: APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAKB220012552021
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
887/2021
Filing Date
03-03-2021
Registration No
887/2021
Registration Date
03-03-2021
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND
Judge
796-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland
FIR Details
FIR Number
5
Police Station
EXCISE PS, GULBARGA
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
EXCISE PS (Police Station) ALAND
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MODIN S/O DASTAGIRI MACHLIBANDAN AGE 45 YRS R/O HIROLLI
SANJU S/O TIPPAYYA GUTTEDAR R/O YALASANGI
Hearing History
Judge: 796-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED | |
| 23-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED | |
| 04-12-2025 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED | |
| 06-11-2025 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED | |
| 03-10-2025 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
Interim Orders
The petition is dismissed as the allegations lack substantive merit and insufficient evidence supports the claims under Sections 3-4 of the relevant act. The court found that witness statements were inadequate and the case facts do not warrant further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The petition is dismissed as the allegations lack substantive merit and insufficient evidence supports the claims under Sections 3-4 of the relevant act. The court found that witness statements were inadequate and the case facts do not warrant further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts