Babu so Bhimasha Dhule Aged 58yrs Occ Agri And busines Ro Kinnisultan Tq Aland Dist Gulbarag vs Siddappa so Bhimasha dhule Age 52yrs Occ Agri Ro Kinnisultan Tq Aland Dist Gulbarga — 200/2013
Case under Sec151 Cpc Section 7rule1cpc. Status: JUDGMENTS. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB220011102013
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
200/2013
Filing Date
02-09-2013
Registration No
200/2013
Registration Date
02-09-2013
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND
Judge
324-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Babu so Bhimasha Dhule Aged 58yrs Occ Agri And busines Ro Kinnisultan Tq Aland Dist Gulbarag
Adv. S.A.PATIL
Hirabai wo hanamanthappa Manthal Age 60 yrsOcc Household Ro Kinni sultan Tq Aland
Respondent(s)
Siddappa so Bhimasha dhule Age 52yrs Occ Agri Ro Kinnisultan Tq Aland Dist Gulbarga
Hearing History
Judge: 324-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland
JUDGMENTS
JUDGMENTS
JUDGMENTS
JUDGMENTS
JUDGMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
| 22-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
| 06-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
| 18-03-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. 200/2013 Outcome: Petition dismissed. This land dispute case between Babu (petitioner) and Siddappa (respondent) concerning agricultural properties in Kinnisultan, Aland taluk, Gulbarga district was decided on 17.06.2023. The court examined the competing claims regarding boundary demarcations and ownership of two adjoining agricultural plots. After analyzing the evidence, boundary descriptions, possession records, and the parties' contentions regarding which plot belonged to whom, the court found against the petitioner's claims and dismissed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. 200/2013 Outcome: Petition dismissed. This land dispute case between Babu (petitioner) and Siddappa (respondent) concerning agricultural properties in Kinnisultan, Aland taluk, Gulbarga district was decided on 17.06.2023. The court examined the competing claims regarding boundary demarcations and ownership of two adjoining agricultural plots. After analyzing the evidence, boundary descriptions, possession records, and the parties' contentions regarding which plot belonged to whom, the court found against the petitioner's claims and dismissed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts