Bharati Sonnada D/o Basavaraj Age 17 Yrs Occ Student. U/g Father. vs The Tahasildar Aland. — 880/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 09th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB220010192026
Filing Number
880/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
880/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND
Judge
796-Addl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 14-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bharati Sonnada D/o Basavaraj Age 17 Yrs Occ Student. U/g Father.
Adv. B.A.Pawar
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Tahasildar Aland.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Orders
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.880/2026 The court allowed a petition by 17-year-old Bharati Sonnada seeking registration of her birth (29-10-2008) and issuance of a birth certificate under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969. Her birth had not been registered due to oversight, preventing her from accessing education and government benefits. The Tahasildar opposed by issuing a non-availability certificate but did not contest the petition. The court, relying on the father's testimony and documentary evidence (S.S.L.C. marks card), found sufficient proof of her date of birth and directed the respondent to register the birth and issue the certificate upon collection of prescribed fees, with a clarification that this order is not conclusive proof if disputed in future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
07-Apr-2026
Orders..
Addl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
06-Apr-2026
Notice
Addl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
26-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 880/2026
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.880/2026 The court allowed a petition by 17-year-old Bharati Sonnada seeking registration of her birth (29-10-2008) and issuance of a birth certificate under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969. Her birth had not been registered due to oversight, preventing her from accessing education and government benefits. The Tahasildar opposed by issuing a non-availability certificate but did not contest the petition. The court, relying on the father's testimony and documentary evidence (S.S.L.C. marks card), found sufficient proof of her date of birth and directed the respondent to register the birth and issue the certificate upon collection of prescribed fees, with a clarification that this order is not conclusive proof if disputed in future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts