Salauddin S/o Ismail Age 40 Yrs Occ Business. vs The Registrar Of Birth And Death, TMC, Aland — 633/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 27th May 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB220007602026

Case disposed

Filing Number

633/2026

Filing Date

05-02-2026

Registration No

633/2026

Registration Date

05-02-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND

Judge

324-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland

Decision Date

27th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii)

Petitioner(s)

Salauddin S/o Ismail Age 40 Yrs Occ Business.

Adv. P S Natikar

Respondent(s)

The Registrar Of Birth And Death, TMC, Aland

Hearing History

Judge: 324-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland

27-05-2026

Disposed

30-04-2026

ORDERS..

29-04-2026

NOTICE

14-03-2026

NOTICE

13-03-2026

NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

27-05-2026
Orders

Case Summary: 633/2026 The court allowed petitioner Salauddin's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, directing the Registrar to register his birth date (01-09-1985) and issue a birth certificate. The court found the petitioner's testimony and supporting documents (non-availability certificate and 7th standard marks card) credible and sufficient to prove his date of birth was never registered due to oversight, despite the respondent's failure to contest the claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 633/2026 The court allowed petitioner Salauddin's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, directing the Registrar to register his birth date (01-09-1985) and issue a birth certificate. The court found the petitioner's testimony and supporting documents (non-availability certificate and 7th standard marks card) credible and sufficient to prove his date of birth was never registered due to oversight, despite the respondent's failure to contest the claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case