Aejaz Ahmed S/o Mohammad Ismail Narayanpet Age 55 Yrs Occ Cook. vs The Registrar Of Birth And Death, through Cheif Officer TMC, Aland — 631/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 18th May 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB220007582026
Filing Number
631/2026
Filing Date
05-Feb-2026
Registration No
631/2026
Registration Date
05-Feb-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND
Judge
324-Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
Decision Date
18-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Aejaz Ahmed S/o Mohammad Ismail Narayanpet Age 55 Yrs Occ Cook.
Adv. Devanand Hodloorkar
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Registrar Of Birth And Death, through Cheif Officer TMC, Aland
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-May-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court allowed petitioner Aejaz Ahmed's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, directing the Registrar to register his birth date (01-01-1970) and issue a birth certificate. The petitioner's testimony and documentary evidence (non-availability certificate and PAN card) established his birth was never registered despite occurring at his residential address, and the respondent's non-appearance left his claim unchallenged. The court clarified this order is not conclusive proof if disputed in future civil or criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-May-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
15-Apr-2026
Orders..
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
14-Mar-2026
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 631/2026
The court allowed petitioner Aejaz Ahmed's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, directing the Registrar to register his birth date (01-01-1970) and issue a birth certificate. The petitioner's testimony and documentary evidence (non-availability certificate and PAN card) established his birth was never registered despite occurring at his residential address, and the respondent's non-appearance left his claim unchallenged. The court clarified this order is not conclusive proof if disputed in future civil or criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts