Ayesha Bi D/o Rauf Zhippare Age 20 Yrs occ Household. vs The Registrar Of Birth And Death, through Cheif Officer TMC, Aland — 609/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 25th May 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB220007362026
Filing Number
609/2026
Filing Date
05-02-2026
Registration No
609/2026
Registration Date
05-02-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND
Judge
324-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland
Decision Date
25th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ayesha Bi D/o Rauf Zhippare Age 20 Yrs occ Household.
Adv. Ramesh Malkappa Tole
Respondent(s)
The Registrar Of Birth And Death, through Cheif Officer TMC, Aland
Hearing History
Judge: 324-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland
Disposed
ORDERS..
NOTICE
NOTICE
NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-04-2026 | ORDERS.. |
| 22-04-2026 | NOTICE |
| 14-03-2026 | NOTICE |
| 13-03-2026 | NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed Ayesha Bi's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, directing the Registrar to register her birth (14-11-2005) and issue a birth certificate. The petitioner provided evidence including her SSLC marks card and a non-availability certificate, proving her birth occurred but was never registered due to oversight; the respondent's absence went unchallenged. The order clarifies it is not conclusive proof of her date of birth if disputed in future civil or criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed Ayesha Bi's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, directing the Registrar to register her birth (14-11-2005) and issue a birth certificate. The petitioner provided evidence including her SSLC marks card and a non-availability certificate, proving her birth occurred but was never registered due to oversight; the respondent's absence went unchallenged. The order clarifies it is not conclusive proof of her date of birth if disputed in future civil or criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts