Ayesha Bi D/o Rauf Zhippare Age 20 Yrs occ Household. vs The Registrar Of Birth And Death, through Cheif Officer TMC, Aland — 609/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 25th May 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB220007362026

Case disposed

Filing Number

609/2026

Filing Date

05-02-2026

Registration No

609/2026

Registration Date

05-02-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND

Judge

324-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland

Decision Date

25th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii)

Petitioner(s)

Ayesha Bi D/o Rauf Zhippare Age 20 Yrs occ Household.

Adv. Ramesh Malkappa Tole

Respondent(s)

The Registrar Of Birth And Death, through Cheif Officer TMC, Aland

Hearing History

Judge: 324-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland

25-05-2026

Disposed

23-04-2026

ORDERS..

22-04-2026

NOTICE

14-03-2026

NOTICE

13-03-2026

NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

25-05-2026
Orders

The court allowed Ayesha Bi's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, directing the Registrar to register her birth (14-11-2005) and issue a birth certificate. The petitioner provided evidence including her SSLC marks card and a non-availability certificate, proving her birth occurred but was never registered due to oversight; the respondent's absence went unchallenged. The order clarifies it is not conclusive proof of her date of birth if disputed in future civil or criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Ayesha Bi's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969, directing the Registrar to register her birth (14-11-2005) and issue a birth certificate. The petitioner provided evidence including her SSLC marks card and a non-availability certificate, proving her birth occurred but was never registered due to oversight; the respondent's absence went unchallenged. The order clarifies it is not conclusive proof of her date of birth if disputed in future civil or criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case