MD Faiz Ansari S/o Mashaq Ansari Age 17 Yrs U/g of Father. vs The Registrar Of Birth And Death, through Cheif Officer TMC, Aland — 605/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 04th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB220007322026
Filing Number
605/2026
Filing Date
05-Feb-2026
Registration No
605/2026
Registration Date
05-Feb-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND
Judge
324-Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
Decision Date
04-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD Faiz Ansari S/o Mashaq Ansari Age 17 Yrs U/g of Father.
Adv. Devanand Hodloorkar
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Registrar Of Birth And Death, through Cheif Officer TMC, Aland
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: MD Faiz Ansari v. Registrar of Birth and Death (605/2026) The court allowed the petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. The 17-year-old petitioner's birth (09-04-2008) had not been registered due to oversight, despite him residing in the jurisdiction. The court found sufficient evidence through the petitioner's father's testimony and supporting documents (non-availability certificate and school marks card) to direct the Registrar to register the birth and issue a birth certificate upon payment of prescribed fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Apr-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
02-Apr-2026
Orders..
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
01-Apr-2026
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
14-Mar-2026
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 605/2026
Case Summary: MD Faiz Ansari v. Registrar of Birth and Death (605/2026) The court allowed the petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. The 17-year-old petitioner's birth (09-04-2008) had not been registered due to oversight, despite him residing in the jurisdiction. The court found sufficient evidence through the petitioner's father's testimony and supporting documents (non-availability certificate and school marks card) to direct the Registrar to register the birth and issue a birth certificate upon payment of prescribed fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts