Mehboob Ali Ismail Shaikh S/o Ismail Shaikh Age 69 Yrs Occ Pvt Work. vs The Registrar Of Birth And Death, TMC, Aland — 596/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 15th April 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB220007232026

Case disposed

Filing Number

596/2026

Filing Date

04-02-2026

Registration No

596/2026

Registration Date

04-02-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND

Judge

324-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii)

Petitioner(s)

Mehboob Ali Ismail Shaikh S/o Ismail Shaikh Age 69 Yrs Occ Pvt Work.

Adv. Sri. S. Keramagi.

Respondent(s)

The Registrar Of Birth And Death, TMC, Aland

Hearing History

Judge: 324-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland

15-04-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

ORDERS..

13-03-2026

NOTICE

12-03-2026

NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

15-04-2026
Orders

Case Summary: Crl. Misc. 596/2026 The court allowed the petitioner's petition to register his birth under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969. The petitioner (age 69) proved through his testimony and school transfer certificate that he was born on 14-05-1956 at Aland but his birth was never registered due to oversight. The court directed the Registrar to enter his birth date in official records and issue a birth certificate after collecting prescribed fees, noting the order is not conclusive proof if disputed in future civil or criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl. Misc. 596/2026 The court allowed the petitioner's petition to register his birth under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969. The petitioner (age 69) proved through his testimony and school transfer certificate that he was born on 14-05-1956 at Aland but his birth was never registered due to oversight. The court directed the Registrar to enter his birth date in official records and issue a birth certificate after collecting prescribed fees, noting the order is not conclusive proof if disputed in future civil or criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case