Satish S/o Vijaykumar Age 25 Yrs Occ Student. vs The Registrar Of Birth And Death, through Tahasildar Kamalapur — 548/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(iii). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 08th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAKB220006742026
Filing Number
548/2026
Filing Date
02-02-2026
Registration No
548/2026
Registration Date
02-02-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND
Judge
796-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Satish S/o Vijaykumar Age 25 Yrs Occ Student.
Adv. B.A.Pawar
Respondent(s)
The Registrar Of Birth And Death, through Tahasildar Kamalapur
Hearing History
Judge: 796-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE JMFC,Aland
Disposed
ORDERS.
ORDERS.
NOTICE
NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | ORDERS. |
| 16-03-2026 | ORDERS. |
| 13-03-2026 | NOTICE |
| 09-03-2026 | NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Crl. Misc. 3941/2025 Court Decision: The petition was allowed. The court ordered the Registrar of Birth and Death to register petitioner Bansilal S/o Dhattaprasad Mishra's birth date (12-10-1965) in official records and issue a birth certificate upon payment of prescribed fees. Key Reasoning: The petitioner's testimony, non-availability certificate, and PAN card proved his birth date and non-registration. Since the respondent failed to contest despite notice, the unchallenged evidence supported the claim. Citing Supreme Court precedent, the court held that births prior to 1969 can be judicially registered. The registration was necessary to prevent hardship and enable access to government benefits and land mutation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl. Misc. 3941/2025 Court Decision: The petition was allowed. The court ordered the Registrar of Birth and Death to register petitioner Bansilal S/o Dhattaprasad Mishra's birth date (12-10-1965) in official records and issue a birth certificate upon payment of prescribed fees. Key Reasoning: The petitioner's testimony, non-availability certificate, and PAN card proved his birth date and non-registration. Since the respondent failed to contest despite notice, the unchallenged evidence supported the claim. Citing Supreme Court precedent, the court held that births prior to 1969 can be judicially registered. The registration was necessary to prevent hardship and enable access to government benefits and land mutation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts