Shifa Mahek D/o Mohammad Khalid, Age.21 years, Occ. Student vs The Chief Officer, TMC Aland — 282/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB220003372026

Filing Number

282/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

282/2026

Registration Date

20-Jan-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND

Judge

324-Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 14-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shifa Mahek D/o Mohammad Khalid, Age.21 years, Occ. Student

    Adv. Ramesh Malkappa Tole

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Chief Officer, TMC Aland

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Case Summary: 282/2026 The court allowed Shifa Mahek's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969 to register her birth. Born on 14-09-2004 but never registered due to administrative oversight, she produced her SSLC marks card and non-availability certificate as supporting evidence. The respondent TMC officer did not contest the petition, and the court found her testimony and documents sufficient to establish her date of birth and the fact of non-registration. The court directed the respondent to enter her birth details in the register and issue a birth certificate upon prescribed fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Orders.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 282/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 282/2026 The court allowed Shifa Mahek's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969 to register her birth. Born on 14-09-2004 but never registered due to administrative oversight, she produced her SSLC marks card and non-availability certificate as supporting evidence. The respondent TMC officer did not contest the petition, and the court found her testimony and documents sufficient to establish her date of birth and the fact of non-registration. The court directed the respondent to enter her birth details in the register and issue a birth certificate upon prescribed fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case