Md. Khalid S/o M.A. Qayyum, Age.51 years, Occ. Business vs The Chief Officer, TMC Aland — 281/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAKB220003362026

Filing Number

281/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

281/2026

Registration Date

20-Jan-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND

Judge

324-Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 14-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Md. Khalid S/o M.A. Qayyum, Age.51 years, Occ. Business

    Adv. Ramesh Malkappa Tole

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Chief Officer, TMC Aland

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Orders

    The court allowed Md. Khalid's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Registrar to register his birth date (01-06-1974) and issue a birth certificate. The petitioner proved his claim through testimony and documentary evidence (school transfer certificate and non-availability certificate) showing his birth was never registered despite occurring at Aland, and the respondent failed to contest the evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Orders.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge JMFC,Aland

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 281/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Md. Khalid's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Registrar to register his birth date (01-06-1974) and issue a birth certificate. The petitioner proved his claim through testimony and documentary evidence (school transfer certificate and non-availability certificate) showing his birth was never registered despite occurring at Aland, and the respondent failed to contest the evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case