Mahadev W/o Sadashiv Jagadale,Age 64 years,Occ Nil vs Syed Dastagir S/o Sayyad Hassan Sab Age 50 years,Occ Business — 1767/2023

Case under Sec151 Cpc Section 166. Status: First Hearing. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

First Hearing Next hearing 06-Jun-2026 this date has passed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAKB210005592023

Filing Number

1762/2023

Filing Date

29-Nov-2023

Registration No

1767/2023

Registration Date

15-Dec-2023

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND

Judge

681-Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Sec151 Cpc Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mahadev W/o Sadashiv Jagadale,Age 64 years,Occ Nil

    Adv. Sri.Nagesh Reddy Advocate

  2. 2.Datta S/o Sunil Jadhav Age 10 years,Occ Student,

  3. 3.Laxmi D/o Sunil Jadhav Age 9 years,Occ Student,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Syed Dastagir S/o Sayyad Hassan Sab Age 50 years,Occ Business

  2. 2.The Manager, SBI General Insurance Co.,Ltd.,

Case History

  1. 06-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    First Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    First Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence.

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  5. 17-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary: In Motor Vehicle Compensation case MVC No. 1767/2023 heard on 17.01.2026, the court examined claims arising from an auto-rickshaw accident. The petitioner's affidavit claiming compensation was accepted and the court called for witness examination. However, the respondent (auto driver) challenged the petitioner's claims regarding lost income of Rs. 24,000/month and other damages as unsubstantiated, and the court found no sufficient basis for the compensation claim. The counterobjection was dismissed as no sufficient grounds were found. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 17-Jan-2026

    Evidence.

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  7. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence.

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  8. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence.

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  9. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence.

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  10. 12-Aug-2025

    A.D.R.

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  11. 23-Jun-2025

    Evidence.

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  12. 19-May-2025

    Evidence.

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  13. 03-May-2025

    Evidence.

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  14. 21-Apr-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  15. 07-Apr-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  16. 24-Mar-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  17. 03-Mar-2025

    Evidence.

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  18. 17-Feb-2025

    Evidence.

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  19. 27-Jan-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  20. 27-Jan-2025

    Evidence.

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  21. 10-Jan-2025

    Evidence.

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  22. 09-Dec-2024

    Evidence.

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  23. 28-Oct-2024

    Evidence.

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  24. 30-Sep-2024

    Evidence.

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  25. 02-Sep-2024

    Evidence.

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  26. 05-Aug-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  27. 13-Jul-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  28. 01-Jul-2024

    A.D.R.

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  29. 27-May-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  30. 08-Apr-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  31. 04-Mar-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  32. 29-Jan-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  33. 22-Dec-2023

    OrdersView PDF

  34. 22-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 29-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1767/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Motor Vehicle Compensation case MVC No. 1767/2023 heard on 17.01.2026, the court examined claims arising from an auto-rickshaw accident. The petitioner's affidavit claiming compensation was accepted and the court called for witness examination. However, the respondent (auto driver) challenged the petitioner's claims regarding lost income of Rs. 24,000/month and other damages as unsubstantiated, and the court found no sufficient basis for the compensation claim. The counterobjection was dismissed as no sufficient grounds were found. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case