Mahadev S/o Sadashiv Jagadale,Age 64 years,Occ Nil, vs Syed Dastagir S/o Sayyad Hassan Sab,Age 50 years,Occ Business — 1745/2023
Case under Sec151 Cpc Section 166. Status: FIRST HEARING. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAKB210005502023
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1760/2023
Filing Date
29-11-2023
Registration No
1745/2023
Registration Date
13-12-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND
Judge
681-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ALAND
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahadev S/o Sadashiv Jagadale,Age 64 years,Occ Nil,
Adv. Sri.Nagesh Reddy Advocate
Respondent(s)
Syed Dastagir S/o Sayyad Hassan Sab,Age 50 years,Occ Business
The Manager, SBI General Insurance Co.,Ltd., 9th floor, A and B wing, Falcom Business Centre,
Hearing History
Judge: 681-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ALAND
FIRST HEARING
FIRST HEARING
EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | FIRST HEARING | |
| 07-03-2026 | FIRST HEARING | |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCE. | |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE. | |
| 25-11-2025 | EVIDENCE. |
Interim Orders
Summary: In MVC No. 1745/2023, heard on 17.01.2026, the court continued the main hearing on a motor vehicle accident compensation claim. The petitioner's affidavit was admitted as evidence. The defendant's counsel contested the claim, arguing that the complainant's income was not properly proven and challenging the basis for the compensation demanded (₹24,000 monthly income claimed for the deceased). One defendant's objection was rejected as no grounds were found. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In MVC No. 1745/2023, heard on 17.01.2026, the court continued the main hearing on a motor vehicle accident compensation claim. The petitioner's affidavit was admitted as evidence. The defendant's counsel contested the claim, arguing that the complainant's income was not properly proven and challenging the basis for the compensation demanded (₹24,000 monthly income claimed for the deceased). One defendant's objection was rejected as no grounds were found. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts