Bharatbai W/o Revansiddappa Beleamgi D/o Chandu Alias Chandappa Biradar Age 50 Yrs Occ Household vs Sundrabai W/o Chandu Alias Chandappa Biradar Age 85 Yrs Occ Nil R/o Siroor G Tq Aland Dist Klb — 141/2023

Case under Sec151 Cpc Section 7,1,2. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 01st April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB210004372023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

29-09-2023

Filing Number

142/2023

Filing Date

29-09-2023

Registration No

141/2023

Registration Date

30-09-2023

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND

Judge

681-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ALAND

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

Acts & Sections

Sec151 CPC Section 7,1,2

Petitioner(s)

Bharatbai W/o Revansiddappa Beleamgi D/o Chandu Alias Chandappa Biradar Age 50 Yrs Occ Household

Adv. SUDHEER PADASHETTY

Sharadabai W/o Laxman Kawalaga D/o Chandu Alias Chandappa Biradar Age 48 Yrs Occ Household

Adv. SUDHEER PADASHETTY

Kalpana W/o Apparao Hatagunda D/o Chandu Alias Chandappa Biradar Age 45 Yrs Occ Household

Adv. SUDHEER PADASHETTY

Deepika Alias Chitra W/o Sanjay Mane D/o Chandu Alias Chandappa Biradar Age 44 Yrs Occ Household

Adv. SUDHEER PADASHETTY

Respondent(s)

Sundrabai W/o Chandu Alias Chandappa Biradar Age 85 Yrs Occ Nil R/o Siroor G Tq Aland Dist Klb

Hearing History

Judge: 681-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ALAND

01-04-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

JUDGMENTS

07-03-2026

JUDGMENTS

04-03-2026

EVIDENCE.

13-02-2026

EVIDENCE.

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Judgment
01-04-2026
Judgment

SUMMARY The court decreed the plaintiffs' suit for partition of ancestral joint family properties, holding that the suit schedule properties (agricultural land and house) inherited from their grandfather constituted joint family property. The court rejected the defendants' claim of prior oral partition unsupported by revenue mutation records, and awarded each plaintiff a 1/7th share in the properties, with additional shares following the death of defendant No. 1 during litigation. The court directed appointment of a Court Commissioner to physically divide the properties according to CPC procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

30-09-2023
Orders
01-02-2024
Issue
01-03-2024
Deposition
15-03-2024
Orders
02-04-2024
Issue
29-07-2024
Deposition
21-10-2024
Deposition
30-01-2025
Deposition
02-02-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The court decreed the plaintiffs' suit for partition of ancestral joint family properties, holding that the suit schedule properties (agricultural land and house) inherited from their grandfather constituted joint family property. The court rejected the defendants' claim of prior oral partition unsupported by revenue mutation records, and awarded each plaintiff a 1/7th share in the properties, with additional shares following the death of defendant No. 1 during litigation. The court directed appointment of a Court Commissioner to physically divide the properties according to CPC procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case