Rajshekhar vs Gurulingamma — 118/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,1,2. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED BY ADR on 07th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB210003862025

e-Filing Number

08-10-2025

Filing Number

120/2025

Filing Date

09-Oct-2025

Registration No

118/2025

Registration Date

13-Oct-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND

Judge

681-Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED BY ADR

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,1,2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajshekhar

    Adv. B A DESHPANDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gurulingamma

  2. 2.Geeta

  3. 3.Chandrashehar

  4. 4.Arpita

  5. 5.Jayashree

  6. 6.Amogh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Summary The court accepted the joint compromise petition filed by the plaintiff and defendant under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, finding no legal impediment to the settlement. The terms were voluntarily agreed upon by both parties without compulsion, and a final decree will be drawn in accordance with the compromise petition upon payment of requisite court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  9. 11-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  10. 14-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 09-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 118/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court accepted the joint compromise petition filed by the plaintiff and defendant under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, finding no legal impediment to the settlement. The terms were voluntarily agreed upon by both parties without compulsion, and a final decree will be drawn in accordance with the compromise petition upon payment of requisite court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case